Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(10):e86837. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.86837.
Abstract
Cancer testis antigens (CTAs) are of clinical interest as biomarkers and present valuable targets for immunotherapy. To comprehensively characterize the CTA landscape of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared RNAseq data from 199 NSCLC tissues to the normal transcriptome of 142 samples from 32 different normal organs. Of 232 CTAs currently annotated in the Caner Testis Database (CTdatabase), 96 were confirmed in NSCLC. To obtain an unbiased CTA profile of NSCLC, we applied stringent criteria on our RNAseq data set and defined 90 genes as CTAs, of which 55 genes were not annotated in the CTdatabase, thus representing potential new CTAs. Cluster analysis revealed that CTA expression is histology dependent and concurrent expression is common. IHC confirmed tissue-specific protein expression of selected new CTAs (TKTL1, TGIF2LX, VCX, and CXORF67). Furthermore, methylation was identified as a regulatory mechanism of CTA expression based on independent data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The proposed prognostic impact of CTAs in lung cancer was not confirmed, neither in our RNAseq cohort nor in an independent meta-analysis of 1,117 NSCLC cases. In summary, we defined a set of 90 reliable CTAs, including information on protein expression, methylation, and survival association. The detailed RNAseq catalog can guide biomarker studies and efforts to identify targets for immunotherapeutic strategies.
Authors
Dijana Djureinovic, Björn M. Hallström, Masafumi Horie, Johanna Sofia Margareta Mattsson, Linnea La Fleur, Linn Fagerberg, Hans Brunnström, Cecilia Lindskog, Katrin Madjar, Jörg Rahnenführer, Simon Ekman, Elisabeth Ståhle, Hirsh Koyi, Eva Brandén, Karolina Edlund, Jan G. Hengstler, Mats Lambe, Akira Saito, Johan Botling, Fredrik Pontén, Mathias Uhlén, Patrick Micke
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,371 | 369 |
| 116 | 58 | |
| Figure | 333 | 25 |
| Table | 28 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 82 | 41 |
| Citation downloads | 36 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,966 | 493 |
| Total Views | 2,459 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
