Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Distinct activation thresholds of human conventional and innate-like memory T cells
Chloe K. Slichter, Andrew McDavid, Hannah W. Miller, Greg Finak, Brenda J. Seymour, John P. McNevin, Gabriela Diaz, Julie L. Czartoski, M. Juliana McElrath, Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic
Chloe K. Slichter, Andrew McDavid, Hannah W. Miller, Greg Finak, Brenda J. Seymour, John P. McNevin, Gabriela Diaz, Julie L. Czartoski, M. Juliana McElrath, Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Inflammation

Distinct activation thresholds of human conventional and innate-like memory T cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Conventional memory CD8+ T cells and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT cells) are found in blood, liver, and mucosal tissues and have similar effector potential following activation, specifically expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B. To better understand each subset’s unique contributions to immunity and pathology, we interrogated inflammation- and TCR-driven activation requirements using human memory CD8+ T and MAIT cells isolated from blood and mucosal tissue biopsies in ex vivo functional assays and single cell gene expression experiments. We found that MAIT cells had a robust IFN-γ and granzyme B response to inflammatory signals but limited responsiveness when stimulated directly via their TCR. Importantly, this is not due to an overall hyporesponsiveness to TCR signals. When delivered together, TCR and inflammatory signals synergize to elicit potent effector function in MAIT cells. This unique control of effector function allows MAIT cells to respond to the same TCR signal in a dichotomous and situation-specific manner. We propose that this could serve to prevent responses to antigen in noninflamed healthy mucosal tissue, while maintaining responsiveness and great sensitivity to inflammation-eliciting infections. We discuss the implications of these findings in context of inflammation-inducing damage to tissues such as BM transplant conditioning or HIV infection.

Authors

Chloe K. Slichter, Andrew McDavid, Hannah W. Miller, Greg Finak, Brenda J. Seymour, John P. McNevin, Gabriela Diaz, Julie L. Czartoski, M. Juliana McElrath, Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic

×

Figure 5

Inflammatory cytokines and TCR-mediated signals synergize to induce MAIT cell effector function.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Inflammatory cytokines and TCR-mediated signals synergize to induce MAIT...
(A) Monocytes were stimulated with ssRNA (a TLR8 agonist); after 24 hours, supernatant was removed and CD8+CD161hiCCR6hi MAIT cells were cocultured with TLR8 supernatant in the presence (TLR8 sup + TCR, dark green) or absence (TLR8 sup only, light green) of anti-CD3/CD28 beads for 24 hours followed by analysis of IFN-γ and granzyme B expression (n = 3). MAIT cells stimulated only with anti-CD3/CD28 (TCR only) beads for 24 hours are shown in black. (B) Using the same donors and experimental setup as in A, monocytes were stimulated with LPS (a TLR4 agonist) in the presence (TLR4 sup + TCR, dark blue) or absence (TLR4 sup only, light blue) of anti-CD3/CD28 beads for 24 hours followed by analysis of IFN-γ and granzyme B expression (n = 3). MAIT cells stimulated only with anti-CD3/CD28 (TCR only) beads for 24 hours are shown in black. (C) Luminex analysis of statistically significant analytes (left panel) or from the cytokines IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 (right panel) from supernatant collected from CD14+ monocytes that were rested (white bars) or activated with LPS (TLR4, light blue bars) reveal differences in cytokine expression dependent on stimulation (n = 4). A lack of a visible error bar in C (right panel) is due to identical data points. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM (where applicable).*P ≤ 0.05. P values were determined by comparing treatment conditions to unstimulated or TCR-only conditions using Mann-Whitney 1-tailed or 2-tailed U test (A–C).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts