Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Distinct activation thresholds of human conventional and innate-like memory T cells
Chloe K. Slichter, … , Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic
Chloe K. Slichter, … , Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic
Published June 2, 2016
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(8):e86292. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.86292.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Inflammation

Distinct activation thresholds of human conventional and innate-like memory T cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Conventional memory CD8+ T cells and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT cells) are found in blood, liver, and mucosal tissues and have similar effector potential following activation, specifically expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B. To better understand each subset’s unique contributions to immunity and pathology, we interrogated inflammation- and TCR-driven activation requirements using human memory CD8+ T and MAIT cells isolated from blood and mucosal tissue biopsies in ex vivo functional assays and single cell gene expression experiments. We found that MAIT cells had a robust IFN-γ and granzyme B response to inflammatory signals but limited responsiveness when stimulated directly via their TCR. Importantly, this is not due to an overall hyporesponsiveness to TCR signals. When delivered together, TCR and inflammatory signals synergize to elicit potent effector function in MAIT cells. This unique control of effector function allows MAIT cells to respond to the same TCR signal in a dichotomous and situation-specific manner. We propose that this could serve to prevent responses to antigen in noninflamed healthy mucosal tissue, while maintaining responsiveness and great sensitivity to inflammation-eliciting infections. We discuss the implications of these findings in context of inflammation-inducing damage to tissues such as BM transplant conditioning or HIV infection.

Authors

Chloe K. Slichter, Andrew McDavid, Hannah W. Miller, Greg Finak, Brenda J. Seymour, John P. McNevin, Gabriela Diaz, Julie L. Czartoski, M. Juliana McElrath, Raphael Gottardo, Martin Prlic

×

Figure 4

Cell contact–dependent and –independent activation of MAIT cells by TLR-stimulated monocytes.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Cell contact–dependent and –independent activation of MAIT cells by TLR-...
(A) Sorted CD8+CD161hi MAIT cells were cocultured with unstimulated monocytes (NS, black), ssRNA-activated (TLR8 agonist–activated) monocytes (TLR8 monocyte coculture, dark green), or supernatant (sup) from ssRNA-activated monocytes (TLR8 sup only, light green) for 24 hours. After 24 hours of coculture directly with monocytes or with supernatant, MAIT cells (CD8+CD161hiVα7.2+) were analyzed for IFN-γ and granzyme B expression (n = 4). (B) A representative FACS plot is shown illustrating IFN-γ and granzyme B expression by MAIT cells. (C) Luminex analysis of statistically significant analytes (left panel) or from the cytokines IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 (right panel) from supernatants collected from CD14+ monocytes that were rested (NS, black) or activated with ssRNA (TLR8, light green) reveal differences in cytokine expression dependent on stimulation (n = 4). A lack of a visible error bar in C (right panel) is due to identical data points. Data shown are displayed as mean ± SEM (where applicable). *P ≤ 0.05 and ***P ≤ 0.001. P values were determined by comparing treatment conditions to unstimulated conditions using Mann-Whitney 1-tailed or 2-tailed U test (A–C).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts