Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Effects of cellular origin on differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived endothelial cells
Shijun Hu, … , Michael P. Snyder, Joseph C. Wu
Shijun Hu, … , Michael P. Snyder, Joseph C. Wu
Published June 2, 2016
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(8):e85558. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.85558.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Stem cells Transplantation

Effects of cellular origin on differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived endothelial cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be derived from various types of somatic cells by transient overexpression of 4 Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, C-MYC, and KLF4). Patient-specific iPSC derivatives (e.g., neuronal, cardiac, hepatic, muscular, and endothelial cells [ECs]) hold great promise in drug discovery and regenerative medicine. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether the cellular origin can affect the differentiation, in vivo behavior, and single-cell gene expression signatures of human iPSC–derived ECs. We derived human iPSCs from 3 types of somatic cells of the same individuals: fibroblasts (FB-iPSCs), ECs (EC-iPSCs), and cardiac progenitor cells (CPC-iPSCs). We then differentiated them into ECs by sequential administration of Activin, BMP4, bFGF, and VEGF. EC-iPSCs at early passage (10 < P < 20) showed higher EC differentiation propensity and gene expression of EC-specific markers (PECAM1 and NOS3) than FB-iPSCs and CPC-iPSCs. In vivo transplanted EC-iPSC–ECs were recovered with a higher percentage of CD31+ population and expressed higher EC-specific gene expression markers (PECAM1, KDR, and ICAM) as revealed by microfluidic single-cell quantitative PCR (qPCR). In vitro EC-iPSC–ECs maintained a higher CD31+ population than FB-iPSC–ECs and CPC-iPSC–ECs with long-term culturing and passaging. These results indicate that cellular origin may influence lineage differentiation propensity of human iPSCs; hence, the somatic memory carried by early passage iPSCs should be carefully considered before clinical translation.

Authors

Shijun Hu, Ming-Tao Zhao, Fereshteh Jahanbani, Ning-Yi Shao, Won Hee Lee, Haodong Chen, Michael P. Snyder, Joseph C. Wu

×

Figure 2

Human iPSC generation and characterization.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Human iPSC generation and characterization.
(A) EC-iPSCs, FB-iPSCs, and ...
(A) EC-iPSCs, FB-iPSCs, and CPC-iPSCs were positive for ESC-specific markers such as TRA-1-60, SSEA4, NANOG, and OCT4. (B) Karyotype analysis showed normal chromosomal integrity in all iPSC lines. (C) Bisulfite sequencing analysis indicated that the promoter region of NANOG was demethylated in iPSCs and ESCs but highly methylated in somatic cells. Closed circles indicate methylated cytosine, whereas open circles denote unmethylated cytosine at selected CpG sites. Each column of circles represents the methylation status of designated CpG sites (4 CpG sites here), and each row stands for a clone containing target amplicons. (D) The quantitative PCR (qPCR) demonstrated that mRNA abundance of pluripotency gene SOX2 in these iPSCs was comparable with those in ESCs, and most mRNAs were transcribed from the endogenous pluripotent gene. Scale bars: 25 μm.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts