Usage Information
Abstract
Testosterone is a key determinant of red blood cell (RBC) biology and susceptibility to hemolysis; however, its contribution to donor-dependent variation in RBC quality and transfusion effectiveness remains unclear. Using data from 2,357 male participants in the NHLBI REDS-III RBC-Omics study, we quantified plasma total testosterone, free testosterone (bioavailable form), and androstenedione and evaluated their associations with donor characteristics, RBC hemolysis, and recipient post-transfusion hemoglobin increments, a clinical measure of RBC transfusion effectiveness. Subphysiological testosterone concentrations were common (~35%) and independently associated with increased storage and osmotic hemolysis. Frequent blood donations were independently associated with lower circulating free testosterone concentrations, even after adjustment for demographic and hematologic factors. Genome-wide association analyses identified loci associated with circulating testosterone, including regions near SHBG, TNFSF12, and the long noncoding RNA BALR6. Several testosterone variants were associated with RBC transfusion effectiveness. Specifically, variants associated with lower testosterone (e.g., TNFSF12) corresponded to higher post-transfusion hemoglobin increments (+9%), whereas BALR6 variants associated with higher testosterone were linked to reduced hemoglobin increments (–40%). In contrast, androstenedione-associated variants were not related to hemolysis or transfusion outcomes. Together, these findings demonstrate that genetic and physiologic variation in testosterone contributes to inter-individual variability in RBC quality and transfusion effectiveness.
Authors
Fang Fang, Nareg Roubinian, Xutao Deng, Cassie Kemmler, Jost Klawitter, Jelena Klawitter, Touraj Shokati, Uwe Christians, Grier P. Page, Tamir Kanias
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 96 | 0 |
| 48 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 12 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 30 | 0 |
| Totals | 186 | 0 |
| Total Views | 186 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
