Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Supplemental material
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Resource and Technical AdvanceIn-Press PreviewClinical ResearchImmunologyInfectious disease Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.204610

A whole-blood cryopreservation method streamlines clinical sample collection for multimodal single-cell immune profiling in sepsis

Alyssa K. DuBois,1 Pierre O. Ankomah,1 Alexis C. Campbell,2 Renee Hua,2 Olivia K. Nelson,2 Christopher A. Zeuthen,2 M. Kartik Das,3 Shira Mann,3 Abigail Mauermann,2 Blair A. Parry,2 Nathan I. Shapiro,3 Michael R. Filbin,1 and Roby P. Bhattacharyya1

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by DuBois, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Ankomah, P. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Campbell, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Hua, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Nelson, O. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Zeuthen, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Das, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Mann, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Mauermann, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Parry, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Shapiro, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Filbin, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States of America

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America

Find articles by Bhattacharyya, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published July 14, 2026 - More info

JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.204610.
Copyright © 2026, DuBois et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published July 14, 2026 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has enhanced our understanding of host immune mechanisms in small cohorts, particularly in diseases with complex and heterogeneous immune responses such as sepsis. However, standard PBMC isolation from blood requires technical expertise and over two hours of onsite processing using Ficoll density gradient separation (‘Ficoll’) for scRNA-seq compatibility, precluding large-scale sample collection at most clinical sites. To minimize onsite processing, we developed Cryo-PRO (Cryopreservation with PBMC Recovery Offsite), a method of immediate onsite whole blood cryopreservation and subsequent batched PBMC isolation in a central laboratory prior to sequencing. We compared multimodal single-cell immune profiling results from samples processed using Cryo-PRO versus standard onsite Ficoll separation in 23 patients with sepsis. Critical outputs including cell substate fractions, marker genes, and surface protein expression were similar for each method across multiple cell types and substates, including an important monocyte substate enriched in patients with sepsis. Capture of T cell receptor transcripts was also comparable across both methods. Cryo-PRO reduced onsite sample processing time from >2 hours to <15 minutes and was reproducible across two enrollment sites, thus demonstrating potential for expanding multimodal single-cell analyses in multicenter studies of sepsis and other diseases.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental tables

View Supplemental Figures

Version history
  • Version 1 (July 14, 2026): In-Press Preview

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Supplemental material
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts