Usage Information
Abstract
Carriers of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1/2 PVs) have elevated young-onset breast cancer risk. To define the pretreatment genomic landscapes of young-onset gBRCA-associated breast cancer, we evaluated 136 treatment-naive tumors diagnosed before age 50 in the prospective POSH study and 66 noncarriers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using whole-exome sequencing, we analyzed somatic variation, allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (asLOH), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and single-base substitution (SBS) signatures. gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 breast cancers had high rates of asLOH but differed significantly in average HRD scores and median SBS composition of signatures SBS1 (aging-associated), SBS18 (ROS-associated), and SBS3 (HRD-associated). Compared with gBRCA2 tumors, gBRCA1 tumors with asLOH were significantly enriched for alterations in hallmark ROS, DNA repair, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways. In ER-positive, HER2-negative tumors from gBRCA1/2 carriers compared with noncarriers, we found significant enrichment of RB1, TP53, FAT1, and MYC single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number variants associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) resistance. Together, these findings demonstrate significant differences between gBRCA1- and gBRCA2-associated breast cancers, and preexisting CDK4/6i resistance mechanisms, supporting prospective trials comparing individualized therapy for gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 carriers and comparing poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors versus CDK4/6i for ER-positive gBRCA1/2-associated breast cancer.
Authors
Mwangala P. Akamandisa, Mingyi Xia, Wilson Cheah, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Kurt P. D’Andrea, Mengyao Fan, Jake S. Shilan, Dana Pueschl, Anupma Nayak, Hayley McKenzie, William Tapper, Ellen R. Copson, Ramsey I. Cutress, Susan M. Domchek, Diana M. Eccles, Katherine L. Nathanson
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 751 | 0 |
| 269 | 0 | |
| Figure | 35 | 0 |
| Table | 1 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 189 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 229 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,474 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,474 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
