Inactivating NOTCH1 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were described over a decade ago, suggesting a tumorsuppressor function—unlike its oncogenic role in other tumors. Today, much debate persists regarding a putative oncogenic role in HNSCC as well, with reports that NOTCH1 signaling drives tumor growth and a cancerstemcell (CSC) phenotype. In this work, comprehensive experiments unequivocally demonstrate that NOTCH1 is a tumor suppressor in HNSCC regardless of mutation or activation status and that it reduces CSC frequency. We developed a signature of NOTCH1 activation showing the pathway is associated with very early differentiation, an altered tumor microenvironment, and better prognosis. Clarifying whether NOTCH1 occasionally functions as an oncogenic driver in HNSCC is crucial to prognosis and personalized therapy. The results presented unify the field, reconcile conflicting data, and provide critical insights into the biological and clinical significance of NOTCH1, with broader implications in other squamous carcinomas with NOTCH1 mutations.
Chenfei Huang, Shhyam Moorthy, Qiuli Li, Kazi M. Ahmed, Kalil Saab, Defeng Deng, Jiping Wang, Xiayu Rao, Jiexin Zhang, Yuanxin Xi, Jing Wang, Zhiyi Liu, Noriaki Tanaka, David A. Wheeler, Eve Shinbrot, Rami Saade, Curtis R. Pickering, Tong-Xin Xie, Adel K. El-Naggar, Abdullah A. Osman, Kunal Rai, Patrick A. Zweidler-McKay, John V. Heymach, Lauren A. Byers, Faye M. Johnson, Vlad C. Sandulache, Jeffrey N. Myers, Pedram Yadollahi, Mitchell J. Frederick
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 330 | 0 |
| 128 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 193 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
| Totals | 704 | 0 |
| Total Views | 704 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.