Insulin and glucagon are described as having opposing actions on hepatic glycogen metabolism. However, here we showed that their coordinated action promoted glycogen turnover and meal glucose storage. In mice, pharmacological doses of insulin or glucagon failed to alter hepatic glycogen, but the combination produced a robust decrease in glycogen content. Additivity between insulin and glucagon was also seen with the activation of hepatic insulin signaling intermediates. This signaling pathway drove glycogen synthesis, suggesting concurrent actions on glycogen breakdown and repletion. A mixed nutrient meal, which stimulates an increase in both insulin and glucagon, enhanced the incorporation of dietary glucose into hepatic glycogen. This was much more pronounced than the effects of glucose alone, which only stimulated insulin secretion. These findings revealed that glucagon is required for efficient hepatic glucose storage when acting in concert with insulin. Coordinated insulin-glucagon signaling, thus, emerged as a critical mechanism for hepatic glycogen cycling, challenging the classical paradigm that these hormones work in opposition.
Nidhi Kejriwal, David Bouslov, Cheyenne R. Castle, Riya S. Karve, Galina A. Arkharova, Ashot Sargsyan, Daniel J. Drucker, Guo-Fang Zhang, David A. D’Alessio, Jonathan E. Campbell, Megan E. Capozzi
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,720 | 0 |
| 949 | 0 | |
| Figure | 595 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 350 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 200 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,814 | 0 |
| Total Views | 4,814 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.