Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive vascular syndrome characterized by aberrant signaling, severe pulmonary artery remodeling, and right ventricular (RV) failure, a major driver of morbidity and mortality. Dysregulation of the apelinergic pathway has been implicated in pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. Using a sugen-hypoxia rat model of PAH, we assessed the ability of a novel apelin analog, resistant to native peptidase degradation, to reverse the pathological hallmarks of PAH and RV dysfunction. Apelin analog therapy corrected the vascular lesions in the lungs and nearly normalized pulmonary arterial pressures. Early cardiorenal syndrome, RV dilation and dysfunction as well as RV cardiomyocyte and fibroblast activation induced by pressure overload, were also reversed by apelin analog treatment. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the lungs and RV revealed apelin-analog treatment activated several protective pathways, including rebalancing protective BMPR2 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2) signaling to counteract excessive pathogenic TGFBR2 (transforming growth factor β receptor 2) activity in PAH. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of exogenous apelin in reversing pulmonary vascular and cardiac pathologies in PAH and support further investigation to evaluate the clinical benefits of apelin analog treatment in patients with PAH and RV failure.
Jennie Vu, Pavel Zhabyeyev, Kemar J. Brown, Joshua M. Gorham, Daniel M. DeLaughter, Huachen Chen, Thilina U. Jayawardena, Ander Vergara, Maria Alexiou, Anjalee Wijewardane, Conrad Fischer, Charlotte Avet, Abby Ewasiuk, Faqi Wang, Mark C. Chappell, Yuri Kim, Michel Bouvier, John C. Vederas, Christine E. Seidman, Jonathan G. Seidman, Gavin Y. Oudit
Usage data is cumulative from June 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 289 | 0 |
| 113 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 101 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 23 | 0 |
| Totals | 526 | 0 |
| Total Views | 526 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.