Mitochondrial dysfunction devastates the heart in major cardiovascular diseases, yet the mechanisms governing mitochondrial quality control remain elusive. We discovered that TIGAR (TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator) deficiency established profound cardiac protection through developmental epigenetic programming of Parkin expression. Using mice with whole-body and cardiomyocyte-specific TIGAR knockout, we demonstrated remarkable cardioprotection following myocardial infarction with maintained ejection fraction, and complete resistance to diet-induced cardiac hypertrophy despite comparable weight gain. TIGAR deficiency triggered dramatic increases in Parkin expression across all somatic tissues except testes, where Parkin levels remained extraordinarily high (100-fold greater than cardiac levels) regardless of TIGAR status, revealing tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms. This protection was entirely Parkin dependent, as double-knockout mice lost all cardioprotective benefits. Crucially, adult TIGAR manipulation failed to alter Parkin levels, demonstrating that this pathway operated exclusively during critical developmental windows to program lifelong cardiac resilience. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing identified reduced DNA methylation in Prkn intron 10 as the key regulatory mechanism, with CRISPR deletion dramatically increasing Parkin expression in multiple cell lines. Our findings reveal how early cardiac metabolism programs lifelong cardiac function through epigenetic mechanisms, and identify developmental metabolic programming as a potential therapeutic target for preventing both ischemic heart disease and metabolic cardiomyopathy.
Yan Tang, Stanislovas S. Jankauskas, Li Liu, Xujun Wang, Alus M. Xiaoli, Fajun Yang, Gaetano Santulli, Daorong Feng, Jeffrey E. Pessin
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,311 | 0 |
| 486 | 0 | |
| Figure | 496 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 265 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 149 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,707 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,707 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.