Usage Information
Abstract
Survival after lung transplantation is limited by chronic, progressive graft failure, termed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Graft-resident mesenchymal cells (MCs) drive CLAD pathogenesis and exhibit stable dysregulated signaling, yet the transcriptomic and epigenomic drivers underlying this fibrogenic transformation remain elusive. We used single-cell multi-omic profiling to characterize gene expression and chromatin accessibility in MCs isolated from lavage fluid of lung transplant recipients with and without CLAD, collected early post-transplantation or after disease onset. MCs obtained after CLAD onset demonstrated a distinct transcriptomic signature compared with non-CLAD controls, enabling classification of disease status at the single-cell level with > 98% accuracy using signature genes. Chromatin accessibility analyses identified enrichment of CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein family transcription factors, specifically CEBPD, in CLAD MCs. Early post-transplant MCs showed minimal accessibility differences, suggesting that CEBPD-associated regulatory changes emerge over time. Integration analyses identified eight MC states and a CLAD-specific shift towards a fibrotic state. CEBPD, SOX4, and FOXP2 were identified as putative regulators of this state with substantial overlap in predicted targets. Targeting CEBPD reversed fibrotic phenotypes of CLAD MCs (decreased ECM expression, contractility, proliferation, and migration). Together, these data provide insights into transcriptomic and epigenomic changes in post-transplant MCs, nominating biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Authors
Lu Lu, A. Patrick McLinden, Natalie M. Walker, Ragini Vittal, Yichen Wang, Fatemeh Fattahi, Stephen T. Russell, Michael P. Combs, Joshua D. Welch, Vibha N. Lama
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 606 | 0 |
| 281 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 147 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 147 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,181 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,181 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
