Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood donation increases the risk of iron deficiency, but its effect on brain iron, myelination, and neurocognition remains unclear.METHODS This ancillary study enrolled 67 iron-deficient blood donors, 19–73 years of age, participating in a double-blind, randomized trial. After donating blood, positive and negative susceptibility were measured using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI to estimate brain iron and myelin levels, respectively. Furthermore, neurocognitive function was evaluated using the NIH Toolbox, and neural network activation patterns were assessed during neurocognitive tasks using functional MRI (fMRI). Donors were randomized to i.v. iron repletion (1 g iron) or placebo, and outcome measures repeated approximately 4 months later.RESULTS Iron repletion corrected systemic iron deficiency and led to trends toward increased whole brain iron (P = 0.04) and myelination (P = 0.02), with no change in the placebo group. Although overall cognitive performance did not differ significantly between groups, iron-treated participants showed improved engagement of functional neural networks (e.g., memory pattern activation during speed tasks, P < 0.001). Brain region-specific changes in iron and myelin correlated with cognitive performance: iron in the putamen correlated with working memory scores (P < 0.01), and thalamic myelination correlated with attention and inhibitory control (P < 0.01).CONCLUSION Iron repletion in iron-deficient blood donors may influence brain iron, myelination, and function, with region-specific changes in iron and myelination linked to distinct cognitive domains.REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02990559FUNDING This work was funded by the NIH.
Authors
Eldad A. Hod, Christian Habeck, Hangwei Zhuang, Alexey Dimov, Pascal Spincemaille, Debra Kessler, Zachary C. Bitan, Yona Feit, Daysha Fliginger, Elizabeth F. Stone, David Roh, Lisa Eisler, Stephen Dashnaw, Elise Caccappolo, Donald J. McMahon, Yaakov Stern, Yi Wang, Steven L. Spitalnik, Gary M. Brittenham
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,709 | 0 |
| 386 | 0 | |
| Figure | 145 | 0 |
| Table | 25 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 136 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 117 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,518 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,518 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
