Usage Information
Abstract
Degenerative retinal disorders leading to irreversible photoreceptor death are a common cause of blindness. Optogenetic gene therapy aims to restore vision in affected individuals by introducing light-sensitive opsins into the surviving neurons of the inner retina. While up until now, the main focus of optogenetic therapy has been on terminally blind individuals, treating at stages where residual native vision is present could have several advantages. However, it is still unknown how residual native and optogenetic vision would interact if present at the same time. Using transgenic mice expressing the optogenetic tool ReaChR in ON-bipolar cells, we herein examine this interaction through electroretinography (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEP). We find that optogenetic responses show a peculiar ERG signature and are enhanced in retinas without photoreceptor loss. Conversely, native responses are dampened in the presence of ReaChR. Moreover, in VEP recordings, we find that optogenetic responses reach the cortex asynchronous to the native response. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning future clinical trials and may direct future preclinical research to optimize optogenetic approaches for visual restoration. The identified ERG signatures, moreover, may serve to track treatment efficiency in clinical trials.
Authors
Eleonora Carpentiero, Steven Hughes, Jessica Rodgers, Nermina Xhaferri, Sumit Biswas, Michael J. Gilhooley, Mark W. Hankins, Moritz Lindner
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,147 | 130 |
| 519 | 28 | |
| Figure | 616 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 216 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 177 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,675 | 160 |
| Total Views | 3,835 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
