Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Interaction between native and prosthetic visual responses in optogenetic visual restoration
Eleonora Carpentiero, Steven Hughes, Jessica Rodgers, Nermina Xhaferri, Sumit Biswas, Michael J. Gilhooley, Mark W. Hankins, Moritz Lindner
Eleonora Carpentiero, Steven Hughes, Jessica Rodgers, Nermina Xhaferri, Sumit Biswas, Michael J. Gilhooley, Mark W. Hankins, Moritz Lindner
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience Ophthalmology

Interaction between native and prosthetic visual responses in optogenetic visual restoration

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Degenerative retinal disorders leading to irreversible photoreceptor death are a common cause of blindness. Optogenetic gene therapy aims to restore vision in affected individuals by introducing light-sensitive opsins into the surviving neurons of the inner retina. While up until now, the main focus of optogenetic therapy has been on terminally blind individuals, treating at stages where residual native vision is present could have several advantages. However, it is still unknown how residual native and optogenetic vision would interact if present at the same time. Using transgenic mice expressing the optogenetic tool ReaChR in ON-bipolar cells, we herein examine this interaction through electroretinography (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEP). We find that optogenetic responses show a peculiar ERG signature and are enhanced in retinas without photoreceptor loss. Conversely, native responses are dampened in the presence of ReaChR. Moreover, in VEP recordings, we find that optogenetic responses reach the cortex asynchronous to the native response. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning future clinical trials and may direct future preclinical research to optimize optogenetic approaches for visual restoration. The identified ERG signatures, moreover, may serve to track treatment efficiency in clinical trials.

Authors

Eleonora Carpentiero, Steven Hughes, Jessica Rodgers, Nermina Xhaferri, Sumit Biswas, Michael J. Gilhooley, Mark W. Hankins, Moritz Lindner

×

Figure 6

Photopic oscillatory potentials in light adapted ERG recordings are not altered in mice expressing ReaChR in ON-bipolar cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Photopic oscillatory potentials in light adapted ERG recordings are not ...
(A and B) Representative recordings obtained in response to 10 cd × s/m2 and 100 cd × s/m2 flash stimuli from WT mice (gray) and ReaChR-expressing, nondegenerate littermates (dark red). Shown are the oscillatory components (filter bandpass 75–300 Hz) as well as the originating ERGs (filter bandpass 0.5–300 Hz, insets, not in scale). (C and D) Summary statistics for the peak frequency of the oscillatory potentials (C) as well as the spectral power at that frequency (D). Data are shown for 10 cd × s/m2 flash stimuli, where no major ReaChR activation would be expected, and 100 cd × s/m2 flash stimuli, where both native cone-opsins and ReaChR are expected to be activated. Spectral power was calculated analyzing the post-a-wave portion of the recordings. Wilcoxon signed-rank test (2-tailed) was used to test for significance between groups.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts