Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
FXR shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PD-L1lo/– non-small cell lung cancer by upregulating HVEM
Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang
Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

FXR shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PD-L1lo/– non-small cell lung cancer by upregulating HVEM

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune checkpoint therapy has changed cancer treatment, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The unresponsiveness of PD-L1lo/– tumors to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is attributed to alternative immune evasion mechanisms that remain elusive. We previously reported that farnesoid X receptor (FXR) was increased in PD-L1lo/– NSCLC. Herein, we found that immune checkpoint HVEM was positively correlated with FXR but inversely correlated with PD-L1 in NSCLC. HVEM was highly expressed in FXRhiPD-L1lo NSCLC. Consistently, clinically relevant FXR antagonist dose-dependently inhibited HVEM expression in NSCLC. FXR inhibited cytokine production and cytotoxicity of cocultured CD8+ T cells in vitro, and it shaped an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in mouse tumors in vivo through the HVEM/BTLA pathway. Clinical investigations show that the FXR/HVEM axis was associated with immunoevasive TME and inferior survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Mechanistically, FXR upregulated HVEM via transcriptional activation, intracellular Akt, Erk1/2 and STAT3 signals, and G1/S cycle progression in NSCLC cells. In vivo treatment experiments demonstrated that anti-BTLA immunotherapy reinvigorated antitumor immunity in TME, resulting in enhanced tumor inhibition and survival improvement in FXRhiPD-L1lo mouse Lewis lung carcinomas. In summary, our findings establish the FXR/HVEM axis as an immune evasion mechanism in PD-L1lo/– NSCLC, providing translational implications for future immunotherapy in this subgroup of patients.

Authors

Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang

×

Figure 5

Correlation of FXR/HVEM axis with tumor immune infiltration and clinical prognosis in NSCLC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Correlation of FXR/HVEM axis with tumor immune infiltration and clinical...
The enrolled 178 NSCLC samples in Figure 1 were subjected to IHC staining of CD8, CD33 and CD68. (A) Representative images showing FXR, HVEM, CD8, CD33, and CD68 expression in patients with NSCLC with FXRhiHVEMhi vs. FXRloHVEMlo profiles (magnification, ×80). Nonspecific mouse or rabbit IgG was used as an isotype control antibody. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B–D) The number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells (B), CD33+ MDSCs (C), and CD68+ TAMs (D) in FXRhi NSCLC vs. FXRlo NSCLC (all P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test; left graphs), or in HVEMhi NSCLC vs. HVEMlo NSCLC (P = 0.0005, 0.0069, < 0.0001, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test; right graphs). (E–G) Correlation analysis between the expression levels of FXR (upper graphs) and HVEM (lower graphs) and the proportions of infiltrating CD8+ T cells (E), CD33+ MDSCs (F) and CD68+ TAMs (G) in 178 NSCLC samples. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and statistical significance are shown. (H–J) The number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells (H), CD33+ MDSCs (I), and CD68+ TAMs (J) in NSCLC samples divided into 4 subgroups based on FXR and HVEM expression (all P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test). (K and L) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for OS (K, P < 0.0001, log-rank test) and PFS (L, P < 0.0001, log-rank test) in patients with NSCLC according to FXR and HVEM levels. In B–D and H–J, data are shown as mean ± SD.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts