Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
FXR shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PD-L1lo/– non-small cell lung cancer by upregulating HVEM
Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang
Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

FXR shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PD-L1lo/– non-small cell lung cancer by upregulating HVEM

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune checkpoint therapy has changed cancer treatment, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The unresponsiveness of PD-L1lo/– tumors to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is attributed to alternative immune evasion mechanisms that remain elusive. We previously reported that farnesoid X receptor (FXR) was increased in PD-L1lo/– NSCLC. Herein, we found that immune checkpoint HVEM was positively correlated with FXR but inversely correlated with PD-L1 in NSCLC. HVEM was highly expressed in FXRhiPD-L1lo NSCLC. Consistently, clinically relevant FXR antagonist dose-dependently inhibited HVEM expression in NSCLC. FXR inhibited cytokine production and cytotoxicity of cocultured CD8+ T cells in vitro, and it shaped an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in mouse tumors in vivo through the HVEM/BTLA pathway. Clinical investigations show that the FXR/HVEM axis was associated with immunoevasive TME and inferior survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Mechanistically, FXR upregulated HVEM via transcriptional activation, intracellular Akt, Erk1/2 and STAT3 signals, and G1/S cycle progression in NSCLC cells. In vivo treatment experiments demonstrated that anti-BTLA immunotherapy reinvigorated antitumor immunity in TME, resulting in enhanced tumor inhibition and survival improvement in FXRhiPD-L1lo mouse Lewis lung carcinomas. In summary, our findings establish the FXR/HVEM axis as an immune evasion mechanism in PD-L1lo/– NSCLC, providing translational implications for future immunotherapy in this subgroup of patients.

Authors

Xiaolong Xu, Bin Shang, Hancheng Wu, Xiuye Jin, Junren Wang, Jing Li, Daowei Li, Bin Liang, Xingguang Wang, Lili Su, Wenjie You, Shujuan Jiang

×

Figure 1

HVEM is positively correlated with FXR, but inversely correlated with PD-L1 in NSCLC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
HVEM is positively correlated with FXR, but inversely correlated with PD...
A total of 178 clinical NSCLC samples were subjected to IHC staining. (A) Representative images showing the expression of FXR, PD-L1, and HVEM in serial sections of FXRhi vs. FXRlo NSCLC samples at low (×80) and high (×320) magnifications. Nonspecific mouse or rabbit IgG was used as an isotype control antibody. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) IHC score of HVEM in patients with NSCLC with FXRhi vs. FXRlo profiles (P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). (C) The number of HVEM high or low tumors in patients with NSCLC with FXRhi vs. FXRlo profiles (P = 0.0016, χ2 test). (D) Spearman’s rank correlation test showed a significant positive correlation between the expression of FXR and HVEM in 178 clinical NSCLC samples (r = 0.275, P = 0.002). (E) IHC score of HVEM in patients with NSCLC with PD-L1hi vs. PD-L1lo profiles (P = 0.0369, Mann-Whitney U test). (F) The number of HVEM high or low tumors in patients with NSCLC with PD-L1hi vs. PD-L1lo profiles (P = 0.048, χ2 test). (G) Spearman’s rank correlation test revealed a significant inverse correlation between the expression of PD-L1 and HVEM in 178 NSCLC samples (r = –0.213, P = 0.0043). (H) IHC score of HVEM in NSCLC samples divided into 4 subgroups based on FXR and PD-L1 expression (FXRhiPD-L1lo vs. FXRloPD-L1lo, P = 0.0655, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test). (I) The number of HVEM high or low tumors in NSCLC samples divided into 4 subgroups based on FXR and PD-L1 expression (FXRhiPD-L1lo vs. FXRloPD-L1lo, P = 0.234, χ2 test followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). In B, E, and H, the line and error bars represent the median and interquartile range.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts