Usage Information
Abstract
The efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies places B cells and their interaction with T cells at the center of attention for multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis. Follicular T helper cells (Tfh), which guide B cell maturation in germinal centers within lymph nodes (LNs), are elevated in the circulation and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with MS (pwMS). However, the LN spatial landscape has remained largely without investigation for pwMS. Using cyclic immunofluorescence, we assessed cell abundance and spatial connections in FFPE LNs of 33 pwMS and 35 non-MS controls. The presence of EBV was analyzed through EBER immunostaining and multiplex quantitative PCR. Our analysis showed that Tfh cells were expanded in LNs of pwMS and accumulated especially in the mantle zone and B cell follicles compared with controls. The Tfh/T follicular regulator ratio was increased in pwMS, while B cell ratios were similar between the cohorts. The interaction of Tfh cells with follicular B cells was higher in pwMS. Interestingly, Tfh accumulation was also observed in 5 prediagnostic MS cases. No signs of EBV latency were detected in either group. These findings highlight LNs as a site of early and persistent immune activation in pwMS, with therapeutic implications to be further addressed.
Authors
Joona Sarkkinen, Eliisa Kekäläinen, Leo Hannolainen, Ada Junquera, Johannes Dunkel, Maria F. Perdomo, Mikko I. Mäyränpää, Sini M. Laakso
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,446 | 120 |
| 319 | 22 | |
| Figure | 388 | 0 |
| Table | 26 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 119 | 10 |
| Citation downloads | 86 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,384 | 152 |
| Total Views | 2,536 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
