Usage Information
Abstract
Pharmacological rescue of F508del-CFTR by the triple combination CFTR modulator therapy elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) leads to unprecedented clinical benefits in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, previous studies in CF primary human airway epithelial cultures demonstrated that chronic treatment with the potentiator ivacaftor can render the F508del protein unstable, thus limiting restoration of CFTR chloride channel function. Even so, quantitative studies of this unwanted effect of ivacaftor on F508del channel function with dependency on cell culture conditions remain limited, and the impact of chronic ivacaftor exposure on restoration of mucociliary clearance that is impaired in patients with CF has not been studied. In patient-derived primary nasal epithelial cultures, we found that different culture conditions (UNC-ALI medium vs. PneumaCult medium) have profound effects on ETI-mediated restoration of F508del-CFTR function. Chronic treatment with ivacaftor as part of ETI triple therapy limited the rescue of F508del-CFTR chloride channel function when CF nasal epithelial cultures were grown in UNC-ALI medium but not in PneumaCult medium. In PneumaCult medium, both chronic and acute addition of ivacaftor as part of ETI treatment led to constitutive CFTR-mediated chloride secretion in the absence of exogenous cAMP-dependent stimulation. This constitutive CFTR-mediated chloride secretion was essential to improve viscoelastic properties of the mucus layer and to restore mucociliary transport on CF nasal epithelial cultures. Furthermore, nasal potential difference measurements in patients with CF showed that ETI restored constitutive F508del-CFTR activity in vivo. These results demonstrate that ivacaftor as a component of ETI therapy is essential to restore mucociliary clearance and suggest that this effect is facilitated by its constitutive activation of F508del channels following their folding correction in patients with CF.
Authors
Anita Balázs, Tihomir Rubil, Christine K. Wong, Jasmin Berger, Marika Drescher, Kathrin Seidel, Mirjam Stahl, Simon Y. Graeber, Marcus A. Mall
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,800 | 115 |
| 441 | 37 | |
| Figure | 258 | 0 |
| Table | 55 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 615 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 117 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,286 | 165 |
| Total Views | 3,451 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
