Usage Information
Abstract
Surgery of the tracheobronchial tree carries high morbidity, with over half of the complications occurring at the anastomosis. Although fibroblasts are crucial in airway wound healing, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms in airway reconstruction remain unknown. We hypothesized that airway reconstruction initiates a surgery-induced stress (SIS) response, altering fibroblast communication within airway tissues. Using single-cell RNA-Seq, we analyzed native and reconstructed airways and identified 5 fibroblast subpopulations, each with distinct spatial distributions across anastomotic, submucosal, perichondrial, and paratracheal areas. During homeostasis, adventitial and airway fibroblasts (Adventitial-Fb and Airway-Fb, respectively) maintained tissue structure and created cellular niches by regulating ECM turnover. Under SIS, perichondrial fibroblasts (PC-Fb) exhibited chondroprogenitor-like gene signatures, and immune-recruiting fibroblasts (IR-Fb) facilitated cell infiltration. Cthrc1-activated fibroblasts (Cthrc1+ Fb), mainly derived from Adventitial-Fb, primarily contributed to fibrotic scar formation and collagen production, mediated by TGF-β. Furthermore, repeated SIS created an imbalance in fibroblast states favoring emergence of CTHRC1+ Fb and leading to impaired fibroblasts–basal cell crosstalk. Collectively, these data identify PC, IR, and Cthrc1+ Fb as a signaling hub, with SIS emerging as a mechanism initiating airway remodeling after reconstruction that, if not controlled, may lead to complications such as stenosis or anastomotic breakdown.
Authors
Jazmin Calyeca, Zakarie Hussein, Zheng Hong Tan, Lumei Liu, Sayali Dharmadhikari, Kimberly M. Shontz, Tatyana A. Vetter, Christopher K. Breuer, Susan D. Reynolds, Tendy Chiang
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,038 | 162 |
| 445 | 33 | |
| Figure | 627 | 4 |
| Supplemental data | 179 | 20 |
| Citation downloads | 107 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,396 | 219 |
| Total Views | 3,615 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
