Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Knockdown of ketohexokinase versus inhibition of its kinase activity exert divergent effects on fructose metabolism
Se-Hyung Park, … , Senad Divanovic, Samir Softic
Se-Hyung Park, … , Senad Divanovic, Samir Softic
Published October 17, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(23):e184396. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184396.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology Metabolism

Knockdown of ketohexokinase versus inhibition of its kinase activity exert divergent effects on fructose metabolism

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Excessive fructose intake is a risk factor for the development of obesity and its complications. Targeting ketohexokinase (KHK), the first enzyme of fructose metabolism, has been investigated for the management of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We compared the effects of systemic, small molecule inhibitor of KHK enzymatic activity with hepatocyte-specific, N-acetylgalactosamine siRNA–mediated knockdown of KHK in mice on an HFD. We measured KHK enzymatic activity, extensively quantified glycogen accumulation, performed RNA-Seq analysis, and enumerated hepatic metabolites using mass spectrometry. Both KHK siRNA and KHK inhibitor led to an improvement in liver steatosis; however, via substantially different mechanisms, KHK knockdown decreased the de novo lipogenesis pathway, whereas the inhibitor increased the fatty acid oxidation pathway. Moreover, KHK knockdown completely prevented hepatic fructolysis and improved glucose tolerance. Conversely, the KHK inhibitor only partially reduced fructolysis, but it also targeted triokinase, mediating the third step of fructolysis. This led to the accumulation of fructose-1 phosphate, resulting in glycogen accumulation, hepatomegaly, and impaired glucose tolerance. Overexpression of wild-type, but not kinase-dead, KHK in cultured hepatocytes increased hepatocyte injury and glycogen accumulation after treatment with fructose. The differences between KHK inhibition and knockdown are, in part, explained by the kinase-dependent and -independent effects of KHK on hepatic metabolism.

Authors

Se-Hyung Park, Taghreed Fadhul, Lindsey R. Conroy, Harrison A Clarke, Ramon C. Sun, Kristina Wallenius, Jeremie Boucher, Gavin O’Mahony, Alessandro Boianelli, Marie Persson, Sunhee Jung, Cholsoon Jang, Analia S. Loria, Genesee J. Martinez, Zachary A. Kipp, Evelyn A. Bates, Terry D. Hinds Jr., Senad Divanovic, Samir Softic

×

Figure 1

Inhibition of KHK activity, but not its KD, leads to hepatic glycogen accumulation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Inhibition of KHK activity, but not its KD, leads to hepatic glycogen ac...
(A) Weight gain of mice on low-fat diet (LFD), high-fat diet (HFD), HFD treated with siRNA, and HFD treated with inhibitor for the last 4 weeks of this 10-week experiment. (B) Lean mass and fat mass normalized by body weight as assessed by EchoMRI. Perigonadal adipose tissue (C) and liver (D) weights at the time of sacrifice. n = 7–8 mice per group. (E) Representative periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stained images of liver histology. Bar = 50 μm. (F) Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis for glycogen in the liver. (G) Glycogen chain length as determined by MS. (H) Heatmap of all glycans and (I) principal component analysis of all glycans in LFD, HFD, HFD + siRNA, and HFD + Inhib groups. n = 4 mice per group. mRNA expression of Gck (J) and the genes involved in (K) glycogen synthesis and degradation. n = 6 mice per group. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA compared with LFD group (#P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001) with post hoc 2-tailed t tests between the individual groups (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts