Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tissue-resident memory T cells contribute to protection against heterologous SARS-CoV-2 challenge
Abby Odle, … , Lok-Yin Roy Wong, Stanley Perlman
Abby Odle, … , Lok-Yin Roy Wong, Stanley Perlman
Published October 15, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(23):e184074. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184074.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Virology

Tissue-resident memory T cells contribute to protection against heterologous SARS-CoV-2 challenge

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

New vaccine formulations are based on circulating strains of virus, which have tended to evolve to more readily transmit human to human and to evade the neutralizing antibody response. An assumption of this approach is that ancestral strains of virus will not recur. Recurrence of these strains could be a problem for individuals not previously exposed to ancestral spike protein. Here, we addressed this by infecting mice with recent SARS-CoV-2 variants and then challenging them with a highly pathogenic mouse-adapted virus closely related to the ancestral Wuhan-1 strain (SARS2-N501YMA30). We found that challenged mice were protected from severe disease, despite having low or no neutralizing antibodies against SARS2-N501YMA30. T cell depletion from previously infected mice did not diminish infection against clinical disease, although it resulted in delayed virus clearance in the nasal turbinate and, in some cases, in the lungs. Levels of tissue-resident memory T cells were significantly elevated in the nasal turbinate of previously infected mice compared with that of naive mice. However, this phenotype was not seen in lung tissues. Together, these results indicate that the immune response to newly circulating variants afforded protection against reinfection with the ancestral virus that was in part T cell based.

Authors

Abby Odle, Meenakshi Kar, Abhishek K. Verma, Alan Sariol, David K. Meyerholz, Mehul S. Suthar, Lok-Yin Roy Wong, Stanley Perlman

×

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2–specific antibody binding in sera and nasal and lung tissues.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
SARS-CoV-2–specific antibody binding in sera and nasal and lung tissues....
Mice were infected intranasally with 105 PFU of XBB.1.5. (A) Schematic detailing the timeline and cohorts used for the antibody binding experiments. Three different cohorts of mice were used in this experiment. (B–D) Sera and nasal turbinate and lung tissues were harvested at the indicated times for the measurement of (B) total antibody, (C) IgG, (D) and IgA binding to WA1, BA.1, and XBB.1.5 full-length spike proteins, as described in Methods. (B) Antibody binding in serum. (C and D) Nasal turbinate and lung tissue IgG (C) and IgA (D) binding. For each cohort, n = 4. Data are from 1 experiment. All results were obtained prior to reinfection with SARS2-N501YMA30. P values were measured by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Data in B–D are shown as mean ± SEM. LOD = 0.67. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts