Usage Information
Abstract
Despite advances in sequencing technologies, a molecular diagnosis remains elusive in many patients with Mendelian disease. Current short-read clinical sequencing approaches cannot provide chromosomal phase information or epigenetic information without further sample processing, which is not routinely done and can result in an incomplete molecular diagnosis in patients. The ability to provide phased genetic and epigenetic information from a single sequencing run would improve the diagnostic rate of Mendelian conditions. Here, we describe targeted long-read sequencing of Mendelian disease genes (TaLon-SeqMD) using a real-time adaptive sequencing approach. Optimization of bioinformatic targeting enabled selective enrichment of multiple disease-causing regions of the human genome. Haplotype-resolved variant calling and simultaneous resolution of epigenetic base modification could be achieved in a single sequencing run. The TaLon-SeqMD approach was validated in a cohort of 18 individuals with previous genetic testing targeting 373 inherited retinal disease (IRD) genes, yielding the complete molecular diagnosis in each case. This approach was then applied in 2 IRD cases with inconclusive testing, which uncovered noncoding and structural variants that were difficult to characterize by standard short-read sequencing. Overall, these results demonstrate TaLon-SeqMD as an approach to provide rapid phased-variant calling to provide the molecular basis of Mendelian diseases.
Authors
Kenji Nakamichi, Jennifer Huey, Riccardo Sangermano, Emily M. Place, Kinga M. Bujakowska, Molly Marra, Lesley A. Everett, Paul Yang, Jennifer R. Chao, Russell N. Van Gelder, Debarshi Mustafi
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,298 | 154 |
| 369 | 53 | |
| Figure | 1,055 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 334 | 23 |
| Citation downloads | 329 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,385 | 230 |
| Total Views | 5,615 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
