Usage Information
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) affects approximately 1% of live births. Although genetic and environmental etiologic contributors have been identified, the majority of CHD lacks a definitive cause, suggesting the role of gene-environment interactions (GxEs) in disease pathogenesis. Maternal diabetes mellitus (matDM) is among the most prevalent environmental risk factors for CHD. However, there is a substantial knowledge gap in understanding how matDM acts upon susceptible genetic backgrounds to increase disease expressivity. Previously, we reported a GxE between Notch1 haploinsufficiency and matDM leading to increased CHD penetrance. Here, we demonstrate a cell lineage–specific effect of Notch1 haploinsufficiency in matDM-exposed embryos, implicating endothelial/endocardial tissues in the developing heart. We report impaired atrioventricular cushion morphogenesis in matDM-exposed Notch1+/– animals and show a synergistic effect of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency and oxidative stress in dysregulation of gene regulatory networks critical for endocardial cushion morphogenesis in vitro. Mitigation of matDM-associated oxidative stress via superoxide dismutase 1 overexpression did not rescue CHD in Notch1-haploinsufficient mice compared to wild-type littermates. Our results show the combinatorial interaction of matDM-associated oxidative stress and a genetic predisposition, Notch1 haploinsufficiency, on cardiac development, supporting a GxE model for CHD etiology and suggesting that antioxidant strategies alone may be ineffective in genetically susceptible individuals.
Authors
Talita Z. Choudhury, Sarah C. Greskovich, Holly B. Girard, Anupama S. Rao, Yogesh Budhathoki, Emily M. Cameron, Sara Conroy, Deqiang Li, Ming-Tao Zhao, Vidu Garg
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,296 | 212 |
| 288 | 43 | |
| Figure | 307 | 9 |
| Supplemental data | 300 | 22 |
| Citation downloads | 85 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,276 | 286 |
| Total Views | 2,562 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
