Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Mechanisms and efficacy of small molecule latency-promoting agents to inhibit HIV reactivation ex vivo
Julie Janssens, Peggy Kim, Sun Jin Kim, Adam Wedrychowski, Gayatri N. Kadiyala, Peter W. Hunt, Steven G. Deeks, Joseph K. Wong, Steven A. Yukl
Julie Janssens, Peggy Kim, Sun Jin Kim, Adam Wedrychowski, Gayatri N. Kadiyala, Peter W. Hunt, Steven G. Deeks, Joseph K. Wong, Steven A. Yukl
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Virology

Mechanisms and efficacy of small molecule latency-promoting agents to inhibit HIV reactivation ex vivo

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Drugs that inhibit HIV transcription and/or reactivation of latent HIV have been proposed as a strategy to reduce HIV-associated immune activation or to achieve a functional cure, yet comparative studies are lacking. We evaluated 26 drugs, including drugs previously reported to inhibit HIV transcription (inhibitors of Tat-dependent HIV transcription, Rev, HSF-1/PTEF-b, HSP90, Jak/Stat, or SIRT1/Tat deacetylation) and other agents that were not tested before (inhibitors of PKC, NF-κB, SP-1, or histone acetyltransferase; NR2F1 agonists), elongation (inhibitors of CDK9/ PTEF-b), completion (inhibitors of PolyA-polymerase), or splicing (inhibitors of human splice factors). To investigate if those drugs would vary in their ability to affect different blocks to HIV transcription, we measured levels of initiated, elongated, midtranscribed, completed, and multiply spliced HIV RNA in PBMCs from antiretroviral therapy–suppressed individuals following ex vivo treatment with each drug and subsequent T cell activation. We identified new drugs that prevent HIV reactivation, including CDK and splicing inhibitors. While some drugs inhibited 1 or 2 steps, other drugs (CDK inhibitors, splicing inhibitors, tanespimycin, and triptolide) inhibited multiple stages of HIV transcription and blocked the production of supernatant viral RNA. These drugs and targets deserve further study in strategies aimed at reducing HIV-associated immune activation or achieving a functional cure.

Authors

Julie Janssens, Peggy Kim, Sun Jin Kim, Adam Wedrychowski, Gayatri N. Kadiyala, Peter W. Hunt, Steven G. Deeks, Joseph K. Wong, Steven A. Yukl

×

Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,477 303
PDF 225 74
Figure 721 0
Table 163 0
Supplemental data 196 11
Citation downloads 75 0
Totals 2,857 388
Total Views 3,245

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts