Drugs that inhibit HIV transcription and/or reactivation of latent HIV have been proposed as a strategy to reduce HIV-associated immune activation or to achieve a functional cure, yet comparative studies are lacking. We evaluated 26 drugs, including drugs previously reported to inhibit HIV transcription (inhibitors of Tat-dependent HIV transcription, Rev, HSF-1/PTEF-b, HSP90, Jak/Stat, or SIRT1/Tat deacetylation) and other agents that were not tested before (inhibitors of PKC, NF-κB, SP-1, or histone acetyltransferase; NR2F1 agonists), elongation (inhibitors of CDK9/ PTEF-b), completion (inhibitors of PolyA-polymerase), or splicing (inhibitors of human splice factors). To investigate if those drugs would vary in their ability to affect different blocks to HIV transcription, we measured levels of initiated, elongated, midtranscribed, completed, and multiply spliced HIV RNA in PBMCs from antiretroviral therapy–suppressed individuals following ex vivo treatment with each drug and subsequent T cell activation. We identified new drugs that prevent HIV reactivation, including CDK and splicing inhibitors. While some drugs inhibited 1 or 2 steps, other drugs (CDK inhibitors, splicing inhibitors, tanespimycin, and triptolide) inhibited multiple stages of HIV transcription and blocked the production of supernatant viral RNA. These drugs and targets deserve further study in strategies aimed at reducing HIV-associated immune activation or achieving a functional cure.
Julie Janssens, Peggy Kim, Sun Jin Kim, Adam Wedrychowski, Gayatri N. Kadiyala, Peter W. Hunt, Steven G. Deeks, Joseph K. Wong, Steven A. Yukl
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,477 | 303 |
| 225 | 74 | |
| Figure | 721 | 0 |
| Table | 163 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 196 | 11 |
| Citation downloads | 75 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,857 | 388 |
| Total Views | 3,245 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.