Cutaneous wound healing is a slow process that often terminates with permanent scarring while oral wounds, in contrast, regenerate after damage faster. Unique molecular networks in epidermal and oral epithelial keratinocytes contribute to the tissue-specific response to wounding, but key factors that establish those networks and how the keratinocytes interact with their cellular environment remain to be elucidated. The transcription factor PITX1 is highly expressed in the oral epithelium but is undetectable in cutaneous keratinocytes. To delineate if PITX1 contributes to oral keratinocyte identity, cell-cell interactions, and the improved wound healing capabilities, we ectopically expressed PITX1 in the epidermis of murine skin. Using comparative analysis of murine skin and oral (buccal) mucosa with single-cell RNA-Seq and spatial transcriptomics, we found that PITX1 expression enhances epidermal keratinocyte migration and proliferation and alters differentiation to a quasi–oral keratinocyte state. PITX1+ keratinocytes reprogrammed intercellular communication between skin-resident cells to mirror buccal tissue while stimulating the influx of neutrophils that establish a pro-inflammatory environment. Furthermore, PITX1+ skin healed significantly faster than control skin via increased keratinocyte activation and migration and a tunable inflammatory environment. These results illustrate that PITX1 programs oral keratinocyte identity and cellular interactions while revealing critical downstream networks that promote wound closure.
Andrew M. Overmiller, Akihiko Uchiyama, Emma D Hope, Subhashree Nayak, Christopher G. O’Neill, Kowser Hasneen, Yi-Wen Chen, Faiza Naz, Stefania Dell’Orso, Stephen R. Brooks, Kan Jiang, Maria I. Morasso
Usage data is cumulative from October 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,064 | 16 |
338 | 1 | |
Figure | 156 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 139 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 31 | 0 |
Totals | 1,728 | 17 |
Total Views | 1,745 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.