Usage Information
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetic condition that results in dysmotile cilia. The repercussions of cilia dysmotility and gene variants on the multiciliated cell remain poorly understood. We used single-cell RNA-Seq, proteomics, and advanced microscopy to compare primary culture epithelial cells from patients with PCD, their heterozygous mothers, and healthy individuals, and we induced pluripotent stem cells (iPScs) generated from a patient with PCD. Transcriptomic analysis revealed unique signatures in PCD airway cells compared with their mothers’ cells and the cells of healthy individuals. Gene expression in heterozygous mothers’ cells diverged from both control and PCD cells, marked by increased inflammatory and cellular stress signatures. Primary and iPS-derived PCD multiciliated cells had increased expression of glutathione-S-transferases GSTA2 and GSTA1, as well as NRF2 target genes, accompanied by elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Immunogold labeling in human cilia and proteomic analysis of the ciliated organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii demonstrated that GSTA2 localizes to motile cilia. Loss of human GSTA2 and C. reinhardtii GSTA resulted in slowed cilia motility, pointing to local cilia regulatory roles. Our findings identify cellular responses unique to PCD variants and independent of environmental stress and uncover a dedicated ciliary GSTA2 pathway essential for normal motility that may be a therapeutic target.
Authors
Jeffrey R. Koenitzer, Deepesh Kumar Gupta, Wang Kyaw Twan, Huihui Xu, Nicholas Hadas, Finn J. Hawkins, Mary Lou Beermann, Gervette M. Penny, Nathan T. Wamsley, Andrew Berical, Michael B. Major, Susan K. Dutcher, Steven L. Brody, Amjad Horani
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,313 | 641 |
| 267 | 104 | |
| Figure | 683 | 0 |
| Table | 46 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 627 | 85 |
| Citation downloads | 100 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,036 | 830 |
| Total Views | 4,866 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
