Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Cytomegalovirus immunity in high-risk liver transplant recipients following preemptive antiviral therapy versus prophylaxis
Danniel Zamora, … , David M. Koelle, Ajit P. Limaye
Danniel Zamora, … , David M. Koelle, Ajit P. Limaye
Published August 5, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(18):e180115. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.180115.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus immunity in high-risk liver transplant recipients following preemptive antiviral therapy versus prophylaxis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CMV-specific T cells, NK cells, and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were assessed in a randomized trial of CMV prevention with preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) versus prophylactic antiviral therapy (PRO) in donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+R–) liver transplant recipients (LTxR) at 100 days (end of intervention) and at 6 and 12 months after transplant. The PET group had significantly increased numbers of circulating polyfunctional T cells, NK cells, and nAbs compared with the PRO group at day 100, and several CMV immune parameters remained significantly higher by 12 months after transplant. Among PET recipients, preceding CMV viremia (vs. no preceding viremia) was associated with significantly higher levels of most CMV immune parameters at day 100. Higher numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional T cells and NKG2C+ NK cells at day 100 were associated with a decreased incidence of CMV disease in multivariable Cox regression. The strongest associations with protection against CMV disease were with increased numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells, CD3negCD56dimCD57negNKG2Cpos cells, and CD3negCD56dimCD57posNKG2Cpos NK cells. Our results suggest that PET is superior to PRO for CMV disease prevention by allowing low-level CMV replication and associated antigen exposure that is promptly controlled by antiviral therapy and facilitates enhanced CMV protective immunity in D+R– LTxR.

Authors

Danniel Zamora, Sayan Dasgupta, Terry Stevens-Ayers, Bradley Edmison, Drew J. Winston, Raymund R. Razonable, Aneesh K. Mehta, G. Marshall Lyon, Michael Boeckh, Nina Singh, David M. Koelle, Ajit P. Limaye

×

Figure 5

Epithelial cell entry-specific neutralizing antibody titers by treatment arm.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Epithelial cell entry-specific neutralizing antibody titers by treatment...
Epithelial cell entry-specific neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers at approximately 100 days, 6 months, and 12 months after transplant. Patients were grouped according to treatment arm: PET (blue) vs. PRO (red). Dilution titers were calculated from IC50 values for graphing purposes by taking the antilog2 of each value. For example, an IC50 of 5 corresponds to a CMV nAb dilution titer of 32. Solid black lines represent the median nAb dilution titer for each group. Comparisons were made using 2-sided Wilcoxon’s rank-sum testing at 95% CI.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts