Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(18):e178973. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.178973.
Abstract
Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) deficiency is a recessive mitochondrial disease caused by variants in DLD, the E3 subunit of mitochondrial α-keto (or 2-oxo) acid dehydrogenase complexes. DLD disease symptoms are multisystemic, variably manifesting as Leigh syndrome, neurodevelopmental disability, seizures, cardiomyopathy, liver disease, fatigue, and lactic acidemia. While most DLD disease symptoms are attributed to dysfunction of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, the effects of other α-keto acid dehydrogenase deficiencies remain unclear. Current therapies for DLD deficiency are ineffective, with no vertebrate animal model available for preclinical study. We created a viable Danio rerio (zebrafish) KO model of DLD deficiency, dldhcri3. Detailed phenotypic characterization revealed shortened larval survival, uninflated swim bladder, hepatomegaly and fatty liver, and reduced swim activity. These animals displayed increased pyruvate and lactate levels, with severe disruption of branched-chain amino acid catabolism manifest as increased valine, leucine, isoleucine, α-ketoisovalerate, and α-ketoglutarate levels. Evaluation of mitochondrial ultrastructure revealed gross enlargement, severe cristae disruption, and reduction in matrix electron density in liver, intestines, and muscle. Therapeutic modeling of candidate therapies demonstrated that probucol or thiamine improved larval swim activity. Overall, this vertebrate model demonstrated characteristic phenotypic and metabolic alterations of DLD disease, offering a robust platform to screen and characterize candidate therapies.
Authors
Manuela Lavorato, Donna Iadarola, Cristina Remes, Prabhjot Kaur, Chynna Broxton, Neal D. Mathew, Rui Xiao, Christoph Seiler, Eiko Nakamaru-Ogiso, Vernon E. Anderson, Marni J. Falk
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,181 | 53 |
| 362 | 14 | |
| Figure | 141 | 1 |
| Table | 13 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 140 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 71 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,908 | 68 |
| Total Views | 1,976 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
