Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(9):e178689. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.178689.
Abstract
Despite the accumulation of cisplatin in proximal tubules, direct visualization of the surrounding peritubular microcirculation, including its change in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI), is lacking. Here, using fluorescence and cellular angiography through video-rate high-resolution intravital microscopy, progressive disturbance of peritubular microcirculation in cisplatin-induced AKI in mice was demonstrated. Fluorescence angiography revealed increasing perfusion defects, with a stepwise rise in time to peak (TTP), originating from capillaries surrounding S1 segments. Cellular angiography demonstrated a progressive decrease in the velocity and track length of individual erythrocytes during AKI progression, accompanied by a sequential decrease in the functional capillary ratio (FCR). Changes in the perfusion area, TTP, and FCR preceded significant changes in blood urea nitrogen and cystatin C, suggesting the potential for early diagnosis. Although neutrophil infiltration near proximal tubules increased throughout the progression, it did not cause obstruction of the peritubular microcirculation. Depletion of neutrophils increased mortality due to systemic side effects, whereas functional inactivation of neutrophils using an anti-CD11b antibody improved peritubular microcirculation in cisplatin-induced AKI. This approach enables direct visualization and quantification of peritubular microcirculation and immune cell dynamics, providing insights into renal pathophysiology and potential therapeutic strategies.
Authors
Inwon Park, Seonghye Kim, Young Woo Um, Hee Eun Kim, Jae Hyuk Lee, Sejoong Kim, Pilhan Kim, You Hwan Jo
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,433 | 90 |
| 415 | 44 | |
| Figure | 338 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 841 | 9 |
| Citation downloads | 114 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,141 | 143 |
| Total Views | 3,284 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
