Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Evaluating precision medicine approaches for gene therapy in patient-specific cellular models of Bietti crystalline dystrophy
Yao Li, Richard R. Yang, Yong-Shi Li, Chun-Wei Hsu, Laura A. Jenny, Yang Kong, Merry Z.C. Ruan, Janet R. Sparrow, Stephen H. Tsang
Yao Li, Richard R. Yang, Yong-Shi Li, Chun-Wei Hsu, Laura A. Jenny, Yang Kong, Merry Z.C. Ruan, Janet R. Sparrow, Stephen H. Tsang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Ophthalmology Therapeutics

Evaluating precision medicine approaches for gene therapy in patient-specific cellular models of Bietti crystalline dystrophy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell–derived (iPSC-derived) cell lines allow for therapies to be tailored to individual patients, increasing therapeutic precision and efficiency. Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) is a rare blinding disease estimated to affect about 67,000 individuals worldwide. Here, we used iPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelium (iRPE) cells from patients with BCD to evaluate adeno-associated virus–mediated (AAV-mediated) gene augmentation therapy strategies. We found that BCD iRPE cells were vulnerable to blue light–induced oxidative stress and that cellular phenotype can be quantified using 3 robust biomarkers: reactive oxygen species (ROS), 4-hydroxy 2-nonenal (4-HNE) levels, and cell death rate. Additionally, we demonstrated that AAV-mediated gene therapy can significantly reduce light-induced cell death in BCD iRPE cells. This is the first proof-of-concept study to our knowledge to show that AAV-CYP4V2 gene therapy can be used to treat light-induced RPE damage in BCD. Furthermore, we observed significant variability in cellular phenotypes among iRPE from patients with BCD of divergent mutations, which outlined genotype-phenotype correlations in BCD patient–specific cell disease models. Our results reveal that patient-specific iRPE cells retained personalized responses to AAV-mediated gene therapy. Therefore, this approach can advance BCD therapy and set a precedent for precision medicine in other diseases, emphasizing the necessity for personalization in healthcare to accommodate individual diversity.

Authors

Yao Li, Richard R. Yang, Yong-Shi Li, Chun-Wei Hsu, Laura A. Jenny, Yang Kong, Merry Z.C. Ruan, Janet R. Sparrow, Stephen H. Tsang

×

Figure 4

Distinct AAV transduction rate from iRPE of individual patients with BCD.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Distinct AAV transduction rate from iRPE of individual patients with BCD...
(A) Immunoblot results of CYP4V2 expression levels in individual BCD patient iRPE lines in response to each AAV treatment strategy. (B) Gating criteria for quantification of GFP-positive iRPE cells. (C) Comparison of transduction rate between AAV2 and AAV5 from individual patient iRPE. All data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 4 technical repeats, significance was calculated by t test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (D) Comparison of transduction rate of AAV2 and AAV5. All data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 9 biological repeats. Significance was calculated by t test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts