Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor treating fields suppress tumor cell growth and neurologic decline in models of spinal metastases
Daniel Ledbetter, … , Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
Daniel Ledbetter, … , Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
Published March 21, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(9):e176962. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.176962.
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Bone biology Neuroscience

Tumor treating fields suppress tumor cell growth and neurologic decline in models of spinal metastases

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Spinal metastases can result in severe neurologic compromise and decreased overall survival. Despite treatment advances, local disease progression is frequent, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Tumor treating fields (TTFields) impair tumor cell replication and are influenced by properties of surrounding tissue. We hypothesized that bone’s dielectric properties will enhance TTFields-mediated suppression of tumor growth in spinal metastasis models. Computational modeling of TTFields intensity was performed following surgical resection of a spinal metastasis and demonstrated enhanced TTFields intensity within the resected vertebral body. Additionally, luciferase-tagged human KRIB osteosarcoma and A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell lines were cultured in demineralized bone grafts and exposed to TTFields. Following TTFields exposure, the bioluminescence imaging (BLI) signal decreased to 10%–80% of baseline, while control cultures displayed a 4.48- to 9.36-fold increase in signal. Lastly, TTFields were applied in an orthotopic murine model of spinal metastasis. After 21 days of treatment, control mice demonstrated a 5-fold increase in BLI signal compared with TTFields-treated mice. TTFields similarly prevented tumor invasion into the spinal canal and development of neurologic symptoms. Our data suggest that TTFields can be leveraged as a local therapy within minimally conductive bone of spinal metastases. This provides the groundwork for future studies investigating TTFields for patients with treatment-refractory spinal metastases.

Authors

Daniel Ledbetter, Romulo Augusto Andrade de Almeida, Xizi Wu, Ariel Naveh, Chirag B. Patel, Queena Gonzalez, Thomas H. Beckham, Robert North, Laurence Rhines, Jing Li, Amol Ghia, David Aten, Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge

×

Figure 6

MRI and histological comparison of tumors exposed to 150 kHz TTFields versus sham control (heat).

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
MRI and histological comparison of tumors exposed to 150 kHz TTFields ve...
Representative T2-weighted MR images from axial (A and G) and sagittal (E and K) orientations shown at the plane of tumor implantation in TTFields-exposed mice (A and E) versus control mice (G and K). Histological analysis of tissues collected from the same mice, displaying axial sections at the same plane as corresponding MR images at ×10.25 magnification (B and H), ×40 magnification (C and I), and ×100 magnification (D and J), as well as sagittal sections at ×10.25 magnification (F and L). Black arrows indicate tumor implantation site. MRI scale bars: 1 mm. H&E scale bars: 500 μm.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts