Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(12):e175800. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.175800.
Abstract
Identifying immune correlates of protection is a major challenge in AIDS vaccine development. Anti-Envelope antibodies have been considered critical for protection against SIV/HIV (SHIV) acquisition. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of an SHIV vaccine against SIVmac251 challenge, where the role of antibody was excluded, as there was no cross-reactivity between SIV and SHIV envelope antibodies. After 8 low-dose intrarectal challenges with SIVmac251, 12 SHIV-vaccinated animals demonstrated efficacy, compared with 6 naive controls, suggesting protection was achieved in the absence of anti-envelope antibodies. Interestingly, CD8+ T cells (and some NK cells) were not essential for preventing viral acquisition, as none of the CD8-depleted macaques were infected by SIVmac251 challenges. Initial investigation of protective innate immunity revealed that protected animals had elevated pathways related to platelet aggregation/activation and reduced pathways related to interferon and responses to virus. Moreover, higher expression of platelet factor 4 on circulating platelet-leukocyte aggregates was associated with reduced viral acquisition. Our data highlighted the importance of innate immunity, identified mechanisms, and may provide opportunities for novel HIV vaccines or therapeutic strategy development.
Authors
Yongjun Sui, Thomas J. Meyer, Christine M. Fennessey, Brandon F. Keele, Kimia Dadkhah, Chi Ma, Celia C. LaBranche, Matthew W. Breed, Josh A. Kramer, Jianping Li, Savannah E. Howe, Guido Ferrari, LaTonya D. Williams, Maggie Cam, Michael C. Kelly, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D. Tomaras, David Montefiori, Tim F. Greten, Christopher J. Miller, Jay A. Berzofsky
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,151 | 32 |
| 243 | 20 | |
| Figure | 307 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 134 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,896 | 52 |
| Total Views | 1,948 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
