Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Innate protection against intrarectal SIV acquisition by a live SHIV vaccine
Yongjun Sui, Thomas J. Meyer, Christine M. Fennessey, Brandon F. Keele, Kimia Dadkhah, Chi Ma, Celia C. LaBranche, Matthew W. Breed, Josh A. Kramer, Jianping Li, Savannah E. Howe, Guido Ferrari, LaTonya D. Williams, Maggie Cam, Michael C. Kelly, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D. Tomaras, David Montefiori, Tim F. Greten, Christopher J. Miller, Jay A. Berzofsky
Yongjun Sui, Thomas J. Meyer, Christine M. Fennessey, Brandon F. Keele, Kimia Dadkhah, Chi Ma, Celia C. LaBranche, Matthew W. Breed, Josh A. Kramer, Jianping Li, Savannah E. Howe, Guido Ferrari, LaTonya D. Williams, Maggie Cam, Michael C. Kelly, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D. Tomaras, David Montefiori, Tim F. Greten, Christopher J. Miller, Jay A. Berzofsky
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV Vaccines

Innate protection against intrarectal SIV acquisition by a live SHIV vaccine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Identifying immune correlates of protection is a major challenge in AIDS vaccine development. Anti-Envelope antibodies have been considered critical for protection against SIV/HIV (SHIV) acquisition. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of an SHIV vaccine against SIVmac251 challenge, where the role of antibody was excluded, as there was no cross-reactivity between SIV and SHIV envelope antibodies. After 8 low-dose intrarectal challenges with SIVmac251, 12 SHIV-vaccinated animals demonstrated efficacy, compared with 6 naive controls, suggesting protection was achieved in the absence of anti-envelope antibodies. Interestingly, CD8+ T cells (and some NK cells) were not essential for preventing viral acquisition, as none of the CD8-depleted macaques were infected by SIVmac251 challenges. Initial investigation of protective innate immunity revealed that protected animals had elevated pathways related to platelet aggregation/activation and reduced pathways related to interferon and responses to virus. Moreover, higher expression of platelet factor 4 on circulating platelet-leukocyte aggregates was associated with reduced viral acquisition. Our data highlighted the importance of innate immunity, identified mechanisms, and may provide opportunities for novel HIV vaccines or therapeutic strategy development.

Authors

Yongjun Sui, Thomas J. Meyer, Christine M. Fennessey, Brandon F. Keele, Kimia Dadkhah, Chi Ma, Celia C. LaBranche, Matthew W. Breed, Josh A. Kramer, Jianping Li, Savannah E. Howe, Guido Ferrari, LaTonya D. Williams, Maggie Cam, Michael C. Kelly, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D. Tomaras, David Montefiori, Tim F. Greten, Christopher J. Miller, Jay A. Berzofsky

×

Figure 1

Study outline of SHIV vaccine and the viral load outcome after intrarectal, repeated, low-dose SIVmac251 challenges in rhesus macaques.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Study outline of SHIV vaccine and the viral load outcome after intrarect...
(A) Schematic illustration of the vaccination and challenge protocol for the 3 groups of animals. (B) Viral loads (VLs) after SHIV vaccinations (n = 6 for vac-SHIV and n = 6 for naive-SHIV) and SIV infections (n = 11). The 7 animals (VS2, VS3, VS4, S3, S5, S6, and N6) that did not show detectable VLs are not shown in the middle and right panel. Mean ± SEM are shown. (C) Envelope sequencing tree of the animals with detectable VL after SIV challenges. (D) Anti-SIVmac251 Env IgG titers in serum samples collected 1 month after the last SIVmac251 challenges. Naive#1 and 2 were samples from macaques with confirmed infection with SIV. (E) SIV-uninfected (SIV-free) curves of the animals from different groups. SHIV-exposed is the combination of vac-SHIV and naive-SHIV groups. In all 3 panels in E, the same 6 naive animals were used for comparisons. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was performed after a series of 8 intrarectal (IR) SIV challenges. For multiple comparisons, Bonferroni-Dunn methods were used to calculate the adjusted P values. Log-rank P values and adjusted P values are shown.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts