Usage Information
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) strongly upregulates the transcription factor Foxm1 in the proximal tubule in vivo, and Foxm1 drives epithelial proliferation in vitro. Here, we report that deletion of Foxm1 either with a nephron-specific Cre driver or by inducible global deletion reduced proximal tubule proliferation after ischemic injury in vivo. Foxm1 deletion led to increased AKI to chronic kidney disease transition, with enhanced fibrosis and ongoing tubule injury 6 weeks after injury. We report ERK mediated FOXM1 induction downstream of the EGFR in primary proximal tubule cells. We defined FOXM1 genomic binding sites by cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT&RUN) and compared the genes located near FOXM1 binding sites with genes downregulated in primary proximal tubule cells after FOXM1 knockdown. The aligned data sets revealed the cell cycle regulator cyclin F (CCNF) as a putative FOXM1 target. We identified 2 cis regulatory elements that bound FOXM1 and regulated CCNF expression, demonstrating that Ccnf is strongly induced after kidney injury and that Foxm1 deletion abrogates Ccnf expression in vivo and in vitro. Knockdown of CCNF also reduced proximal tubule proliferation in vitro. These studies identify an ERK/FOXM1/CCNF signaling pathway that regulates injury-induced proximal tubule cell proliferation.
Authors
Megan L. Noonan, Yoshiharu Muto, Yasuhiro Yoshimura, Aidan Leckie-Harre, Haojia Wu, Vladimir V. Kalinichenko, Benjamin D. Humphreys, Monica Chang-Panesso
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,595 | 236 |
| 265 | 36 | |
| Figure | 419 | 4 |
| Supplemental data | 191 | 27 |
| Citation downloads | 96 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,566 | 303 |
| Total Views | 2,869 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
