Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is part of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2, which promotes trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) and gene repression. EZH2 is overexpressed in many cancers, and studies in mice attributed both prooncogenic and tumor suppressive functions to EZH2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). EZH2 deletion enhances de novo KRAS-driven neoplasia following pancreatic injury, while increased EZH2 expression in patients with PDAC is correlated to poor prognosis, suggesting a context-dependant effect for EZH2 in PDAC progression. In this study, we examined EZH2 in pre- and early neoplastic stages of PDAC. Using an inducible model to delete the SET domain of EZH2 in adult acinar cells (EZH2ΔSET), we showed that loss of EZH2 activity did not prevent acinar cell regeneration in the absence of oncogenic KRAS (KRASG12D) nor did it increase PanIN formation following KRASG12D activation in adult mice. Loss of EZH2 did reduce recruitment of inflammatory cells and, when combined with a more aggressive PDAC model, promoted widespread PDAC progression and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. This study suggests that expression of EZH2 in adult acinar cells restricts PDAC initiation and progression by affecting both the tumor microenvironment and acinar cell differentiation.

Authors

Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin

×

Figure 6

MKE mice exhibit extensive ductal and PanIN lesion progression.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

MKE mice exhibit extensive ductal and PanIN lesion progression.
(A and ...
(A and B) Representative IHC for amylase (A) or CK-19 (B) on pancreatic tissue 60 days after KRASG12D induction. Genotypes are indicated. Scale bar: 100 μm. (C) Quantification of amylase staining in the various genotypes based on IHC staining. Data are shown as mean ± minimum to maximum (n = 3 mice for KRASG12D; n = 5 mice for Ezh2ΔSET, KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET, and Mist1creERT/– KRASG12D; and n = 6 mice for control and MKE). Significance was measured by 1-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. bP ≤ 0.001. (D) Representative immunofluorescence for SOX9 on pancreatic sections 60 days after KRASG12D induction. Genotypes are indicated. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI. White arrows identity positive SOX9 cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Quantification of SOX9 staining in the different mouse lines based on IF staining. Data are shown as mean ± minimum to maximum (n = 3 mice per conditions). Significance was measured by 1-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. Different letters indicate statistically different P values. bP ≤ 0.001, cP ≤ 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts