Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is part of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2, which promotes trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) and gene repression. EZH2 is overexpressed in many cancers, and studies in mice attributed both prooncogenic and tumor suppressive functions to EZH2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). EZH2 deletion enhances de novo KRAS-driven neoplasia following pancreatic injury, while increased EZH2 expression in patients with PDAC is correlated to poor prognosis, suggesting a context-dependant effect for EZH2 in PDAC progression. In this study, we examined EZH2 in pre- and early neoplastic stages of PDAC. Using an inducible model to delete the SET domain of EZH2 in adult acinar cells (EZH2ΔSET), we showed that loss of EZH2 activity did not prevent acinar cell regeneration in the absence of oncogenic KRAS (KRASG12D) nor did it increase PanIN formation following KRASG12D activation in adult mice. Loss of EZH2 did reduce recruitment of inflammatory cells and, when combined with a more aggressive PDAC model, promoted widespread PDAC progression and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. This study suggests that expression of EZH2 in adult acinar cells restricts PDAC initiation and progression by affecting both the tumor microenvironment and acinar cell differentiation.

Authors

Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin

×

Figure 3

Loss of EZH2 methyltransferase activity alters the effects of KRASG12 on expression of genes linked to the tissue microenvironment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Loss of EZH2 methyltransferase activity alters the effects of KRASG12 on...
(A) Volcano plot of RNA-Seq analysis between control and KRASG12D pancreata 22 days after TX gavage. Significantly downregulated genes are shown in blue and significantly upregulated genes in red. Significance was evaluated with FDR ≤ 0.05. (B and C) Similar Volcano plots comparing gene expression between KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET and control (B) or KRASG12D (C) pancreatic tissue 22 days after activating KRASG12D (n = 3 mice). (D) KEGG pathway analysis performed on genes enriched for K27me3 and K4me3 identifies an increase in the state 4 pathways in KRASG12D tissue (number of pathways) including unique enrichment of downstream mediators of KRAS signaling (red arrows). (E) KEGG pathway analysis based on DEGs from RNA-Seq identified enriched pathways between KRASG12D (all pathways shown) or KRASG12DEZH2ΔSET (top 20 pathways shown) and control tissue. Bars indicate –log10 (P value), and dots indicate gene counts. Arrows indicate KRAS-related pathways unique (red) or common (black) to each data set. (F) Gene set enrichment analysis comparing enrichment of HALLMARK_KRAS_UP signaling between control, KRASG12D, and KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET tissue 22 days following tamoxifen treatment. Normalized enrichment scores (NES) are significantly different between KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET and both control and KRASG12D expression (n = 3).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts