Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Peripherally restricted PICK1 inhibitor mPD5 ameliorates pain behaviors in murine inflammatory and neuropathic pain models
Kathrine Louise Jensen, … , Andreas Toft Sørensen, Kenneth Lindegaard Madsen
Kathrine Louise Jensen, … , Andreas Toft Sørensen, Kenneth Lindegaard Madsen
Published September 17, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(20):e170976. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.170976.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience

Peripherally restricted PICK1 inhibitor mPD5 ameliorates pain behaviors in murine inflammatory and neuropathic pain models

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Chronic pain is a complex, debilitating, and escalating health problem worldwide, impacting 1 in 5 adults. Current treatment is compromised by dose-limiting side effects, including high abuse liability, loss of ability to function socially and professionally, fatigue, drowsiness, and apathy. PICK1 has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Here, we developed and characterized a cell-permeable fatty acid–conjugated bivalent peptide inhibitor of PICK1 and assessed its effects on acute and chronic pain. The myristoylated PICK1 inhibitor, myr-NPEG4-(HWLKV)2 (mPD5), self-assembled into core-shell micelles that provided favorable pharmacodynamic properties and relieved evoked mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity as well as ongoing hypersensitivity and anxiodepressive symptoms in mouse models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain following subcutaneous administration. No overt side effects were associated with mPD5 administration, and it had no effect on acute nociception. Finally, neuropathic pain was relieved far into the chronic phase (18 weeks after spared nerve injury surgery) and while the effect of a single injection ceased after a few hours, repeated administration provided pain relief lasting up to 20 hours after the last injection.

Authors

Kathrine Louise Jensen, Nikolaj Riis Christensen, Carolyn Marie Goddard, Sara Elgaard Jager, Gith Noes-Holt, Ida Buur Kanneworff, Alexander Jakobsen, Lucía Jiménez-Fernández, Emily G. Peck, Line Sivertsen, Raquel Comaposada Baro, Grace Anne Houser, Felix Paul Mayer, Marta Diaz-delCastillo, Marie Løth Topp, Chelsea Hopkins, Cecilie Dubgaard Thomsen, Ahmed Barakat Ibrahim Soltan, Frederik Grønbæk Tidemand, Lise Arleth, Anne-Marie Heegaard, Andreas Toft Sørensen, Kenneth Lindegaard Madsen

×

Figure 3

Efficacy of mPD5 in a mouse model of inflammatory pain.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Efficacy of mPD5 in a mouse model of inflammatory pain.
(A) Paw withdraw...
(A) Paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) before and after induction of inflammatory pain (CFA-induced) and treatment (i.t.) with mPD5 or saline. nsaline= 5, nmPD5 = 6. (B) PWT before and after induction of inflammatory pain or sham and s.c. treatment with mPD5 or saline. nsaline→saline = 4, nCFA→saline = 5, nCFA→mPD5 = 6. (C) PWT before and after induction of inflammatory pain and s.c. treatment with mPD5. n50 = 5, n10 = 6, n2 = 5. (D) Timeline of E–G. (E) Paw withdrawal latency before and after induction of inflammatory pain and s.c. treatment with mPD5 or PBS. n = 6. (F) Marbles buried after induction of inflammatory pain or sham 1 hour after s.c. treatment with mPD5 or PBS. n = 12. (G) Time spent in open arms of an elevated plus maze relative to sham, after induction of inflammatory pain or sham 1 hour after s.c. treatment with mPD5 or PBS. n = 12. (H) Schematic overview of sePP with 2 counterbalanced days of conditioning followed by a test day. (I) Time spent in the paired compartment of mice in inflammatory pain conditioned with 30 μmol/kg mPD5 or saline in the paired compartment. nPBS= 13, nmPD5 = 12. (J) Time spent in the paired compartment of naive mice conditioned with 30 μmol/kg mPD5 or saline in the paired compartment. n = 7. adm., administration; BL, baseline; CFA, complete Freund’s adjuvant; HG, Hargreaves test; hrs, hours; inj., injection; i.pl., intraplantar; i.t., intrathecal; s.c., subcutaneous; sePP, single exposure place preference; NS, not significant. Dashed lines in A–C and E indicate the contralateral paw. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 by 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test vs. 0 hours (A–C and E), 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (F and G), or unpaired, 2-tailed t test (I and J).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts