Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The unfolded protein response links ER stress to cancer-associated thrombosis
Oluwatoyosi Muse, Rushad Patell, Christian G. Peters, Moua Yang, Emale El-Darzi, Sol Schulman, Anna Falanga, Marina Marchetti, Laura Russo, Jeffrey I. Zwicker, Robert Flaumenhaft
Oluwatoyosi Muse, Rushad Patell, Christian G. Peters, Moua Yang, Emale El-Darzi, Sol Schulman, Anna Falanga, Marina Marchetti, Laura Russo, Jeffrey I. Zwicker, Robert Flaumenhaft
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hematology

The unfolded protein response links ER stress to cancer-associated thrombosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Thrombosis is a common complication of advanced cancer, yet the cellular mechanisms linking malignancy to thrombosis are poorly understood. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an ER stress response associated with advanced cancers. A proteomic evaluation of plasma from patients with gastric and non–small cell lung cancer who were monitored prospectively for venous thromboembolism demonstrated increased levels of UPR-related markers in plasma of patients who developed clots compared with those who did not. Release of procoagulant activity into supernatants of gastric, lung, and pancreatic cancer cells was enhanced by UPR induction and blocked by antagonists of the UPR receptors inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) and protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK). Release of extracellular vesicles bearing tissue factor (EVTFs) from pancreatic cancer cells was inhibited by siRNA-mediated knockdown of IRE1α/XBP1 or PERK pathways. Induction of UPR did not increase tissue factor (TF) synthesis, but rather stimulated localization of TF to the cell surface. UPR-induced TF delivery to EVTFs was inhibited by ADP-ribosylation factor 1 knockdown or GBF1 antagonism, verifying the role of vesicular trafficking. Our findings show that UPR activation resulted in increased vesicular trafficking leading to release of prothrombotic EVTFs, thus providing a mechanistic link between ER stress and cancer-associated thrombosis.

Authors

Oluwatoyosi Muse, Rushad Patell, Christian G. Peters, Moua Yang, Emale El-Darzi, Sol Schulman, Anna Falanga, Marina Marchetti, Laura Russo, Jeffrey I. Zwicker, Robert Flaumenhaft

×

Figure 1

Plasma from patients with cancer who develop VTE is enriched in UPR-related analytes.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Plasma from patients with cancer who develop VTE is enriched in UPR-rela...
Plasma samples were collected from 20 patients with gastric cancer and 19 patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Patients were followed prospectively for the development of VTE, which developed in 10 patients with gastric cancer and 9 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. (A) A volcano plot of 7,596 analytes tested using the SomaScan platform. Analytes that were significantly different (P < 6.6 × 10–6) between patients who developed VTE and those who did not are shown in red. Of these, 18 showed a greater than 2-fold difference between VTE and non-VTE, and the 4 shown in blue are UPR-related proteins. CLGN, calmegin; TXNDC15, thioredoxin domain containing 15 (or TMX5); RCN1, reticulocalbin 1. (B) The 18 proteins that were significantly elevated by >2-fold are shown in a heatmap that presents data for each patient normalized to the average value for that protein. Outliers are shown in white. (C) ROC curves of the 4 UPR-related proteins. (D) Values in patients who had no VTE over the observation period (no VTE) compared with those who went on to develop VTE (VTE) for UPR-related analytes for patients with gastric and non–small cell lung cancer are indicated (P values were obtained using a 2-tailed t test).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts