Neonatal gene therapy has been shown to prevent inner ear dysfunction in mouse models of Usher syndrome type I (USH1), the most common genetic cause of combined deafness-blindness and vestibular dysfunction. However, hearing onset occurs after birth in mice and in utero in humans, making it questionable how to transpose murine gene therapy outcomes to clinical settings. Here, we sought to extend the therapeutic time window in a mouse model for USH1G to periods corresponding to human neonatal stages, more suitable for intervention in patients. Mice with deletion of Ush1g (Ush1g–/–) were subjected to gene therapy after the hearing onset. The rescue of inner ear hair cell structure was evaluated by confocal imaging and electron microscopy. Hearing and vestibular function were assessed by recordings of the auditory brain stem response and vestibulo-ocular reflex and by locomotor tests. Up to P21, gene therapy significantly restored both the hearing and balance deficits in Ush1g–/– mice. However, beyond this age and up to P30, vestibular function was restored but not hearing. Our data show that effective gene therapy is possible in Ush1g–/– mice well beyond neonatal stages, implying that the therapeutic window for USH1G may be wide enough to be transposable to newborn humans.
Ghizlene Lahlou, Charlotte Calvet, François Simon, Vincent Michel, Lauranne Alciato, Baptiste Plion, Jacques Boutet de Monvel, Marie-José Lecomte, Mathieu Beraneck, Christine Petit, Saaid Safieddine
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 976 | 249 |
266 | 86 | |
Figure | 241 | 10 |
Supplemental data | 140 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
Totals | 1,666 | 352 |
Total Views | 2,018 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.