Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(3):e168911. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168911.
Abstract
While the function of many leukocytes in transplant biology has been well defined, the role of eosinophils is controversial and remains poorly explored. Conflicting data exist regarding eosinophils’ role in alloimmunity. Due to their prevalence in the lung, and their defined role in other pulmonary pathologies such as asthma, we set out to explore the role of eosinophils in the long-term maintenance of the lung allograft. We noted that depletion of eosinophils results in the generation of donor-specific antibodies. Eosinophil depletion increased memory B cell, plasma cell, and antibody-secreting cell differentiation and resulted in de novo generation of follicular germinal centers. Germinal center formation depended on the expansion of CD4+Foxp3–Bcl6+CXCR5+PD-1+ T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, which increase in number after eosinophil depletion. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that eosinophils prevent Tfh cell generation by acting as the dominant source of IFN-γ in an established lung allograft, thus facilitating Th1 rather than Tfh polarization of naive CD4+ T cells. Our data thus describe what we believe is a unique and previously unknown role for eosinophils in maintaining allograft tolerance and suggest that indiscriminate administration of eosinophil-lytic corticosteroids for treatment of acute cellular rejection may inadvertently promote humoral alloimmunity.
Authors
Zhongcheng Mei, May A. Khalil, Yizhan Guo, Dongge Li, Anirban Banerjee, Yuriko Terada, Yuhei Yokoyama, Christina Kratzmeier, Kelly Chen, Lushen Li, Christine L. Lau, Jean-Paul Courneya, Irina G. Luzina, Sergei P. Atamas, Andrew E. Gelman, Daniel Kreisel, Elizabeth A. Jacobsen, Alexander S. Krupnick
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,731 | 141 |
| 407 | 80 | |
| Figure | 40 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 13 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 105 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,296 | 221 |
| Total Views | 2,517 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
