Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Innate immune activation restricts priming and protective efficacy of the radiation-attenuated PfSPZ malaria vaccine
Leetah Senkpeil, Jyoti Bhardwaj, Morgan R. Little, Prasida Holla, Aditi Upadhye, Elizabeth M. Fusco, Phillip A. Swanson II, Ryan E. Wiegand, Michael D. Macklin, Kevin Bi, Barbara J. Flynn, Ayako Yamamoto, Erik L. Gaskin, D. Noah Sather, Adrian L. Oblak, Edward Simpson, Hongyu Gao, W. Nicholas Haining, Kathleen B. Yates, Xiaowen Liu, Tooba Murshedkar, Thomas L. Richie, B. Kim Lee Sim, Kephas Otieno, Simon Kariuki, Xiaoling Xuei, Yunlong Liu, Rafael B. Polidoro, Stephen L. Hoffman, Martina Oneko, Laura C. Steinhardt, Nathan W. Schmidt, Robert A. Seder, Tuan M. Tran
Leetah Senkpeil, Jyoti Bhardwaj, Morgan R. Little, Prasida Holla, Aditi Upadhye, Elizabeth M. Fusco, Phillip A. Swanson II, Ryan E. Wiegand, Michael D. Macklin, Kevin Bi, Barbara J. Flynn, Ayako Yamamoto, Erik L. Gaskin, D. Noah Sather, Adrian L. Oblak, Edward Simpson, Hongyu Gao, W. Nicholas Haining, Kathleen B. Yates, Xiaowen Liu, Tooba Murshedkar, Thomas L. Richie, B. Kim Lee Sim, Kephas Otieno, Simon Kariuki, Xiaoling Xuei, Yunlong Liu, Rafael B. Polidoro, Stephen L. Hoffman, Martina Oneko, Laura C. Steinhardt, Nathan W. Schmidt, Robert A. Seder, Tuan M. Tran
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Vaccines

Innate immune activation restricts priming and protective efficacy of the radiation-attenuated PfSPZ malaria vaccine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

A systems analysis was conducted to determine the potential molecular mechanisms underlying differential immunogenicity and protective efficacy results of a clinical trial of the radiation-attenuated whole-sporozoite PfSPZ vaccine in African infants. Innate immune activation and myeloid signatures at prevaccination baseline correlated with protection from P. falciparum parasitemia in placebo controls. These same signatures were associated with susceptibility to parasitemia among infants who received the highest and most protective PfSPZ vaccine dose. Machine learning identified spliceosome, proteosome, and resting DC signatures as prevaccination features predictive of protection after highest-dose PfSPZ vaccination, whereas baseline circumsporozoite protein–specific (CSP-specific) IgG predicted nonprotection. Prevaccination innate inflammatory and myeloid signatures were associated with higher sporozoite-specific IgG Ab response but undetectable PfSPZ-specific CD8+ T cell responses after vaccination. Consistent with these human data, innate stimulation in vivo conferred protection against infection by sporozoite injection in malaria-naive mice while diminishing the CD8+ T cell response to radiation-attenuated sporozoites. These data suggest a dichotomous role of innate stimulation for malaria protection and induction of protective immunity by whole-sporozoite malaria vaccines. The uncoupling of vaccine-induced protective immunity achieved by Abs from more protective CD8+ T cell responses suggests that PfSPZ vaccine efficacy in malaria-endemic settings may be constrained by opposing antigen presentation pathways.

Authors

Leetah Senkpeil, Jyoti Bhardwaj, Morgan R. Little, Prasida Holla, Aditi Upadhye, Elizabeth M. Fusco, Phillip A. Swanson II, Ryan E. Wiegand, Michael D. Macklin, Kevin Bi, Barbara J. Flynn, Ayako Yamamoto, Erik L. Gaskin, D. Noah Sather, Adrian L. Oblak, Edward Simpson, Hongyu Gao, W. Nicholas Haining, Kathleen B. Yates, Xiaowen Liu, Tooba Murshedkar, Thomas L. Richie, B. Kim Lee Sim, Kephas Otieno, Simon Kariuki, Xiaoling Xuei, Yunlong Liu, Rafael B. Polidoro, Stephen L. Hoffman, Martina Oneko, Laura C. Steinhardt, Nathan W. Schmidt, Robert A. Seder, Tuan M. Tran

×

Figure 3

Baseline monocyte and innate inflammatory signatures correlate with postvaccination CSP-specific B cell responses.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Baseline monocyte and innate inflammatory signatures correlate with post...
(A) Volcano plot of CSP-specific IgG and flow cytometry features at each time point or calculated as fold-change after vaccination over baseline. (B) Correlation between CSP-specific MBCs and time to first parasitemia up to 6 months separated by protected (P) and not protected (NP) outcome at 3 months. (C) GSEA using genes ranked by direction and significance of correlation between baseline expression and percentage of CSP-specific of MBCs at 2 weeks after vaccination. (D) CSP-specific IgG at baseline and as fold-change (postvaccination/baseline) by treatment and outcome. *P < 0.05 between outcomes within a treatment by Wilcoxon test. Dotted line indicates threshold for high-CSP IgG response. (E) GSEA using genes ranked by direction and significance of DGE at baseline between 1.8 × 106 PfSPZ vaccine recipients who subsequently had high or low CSP-specific IgG response after vaccination as defined in D. For C and E, only modules with a Benjamini-Hochberg–adjusted P < 0.05 are shown. NES, normalized enrichment score.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts