Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Differential histone acetylation and super-enhancer regulation underlie melanoma cell dedifferentiation
Karen Mendelson, Tiphaine C. Martin, Christie B. Nguyen, Min Hsu, Jia Xu, Claudia Lang, Reinhard Dummer, Yvonne Saenger, Jane L. Messina, Vernon K. Sondak, Garrett Desman, Dan Hasson, Emily Bernstein, Ramon E. Parsons, Julide Tok Celebi
Karen Mendelson, Tiphaine C. Martin, Christie B. Nguyen, Min Hsu, Jia Xu, Claudia Lang, Reinhard Dummer, Yvonne Saenger, Jane L. Messina, Vernon K. Sondak, Garrett Desman, Dan Hasson, Emily Bernstein, Ramon E. Parsons, Julide Tok Celebi
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Dermatology

Differential histone acetylation and super-enhancer regulation underlie melanoma cell dedifferentiation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Dedifferentiation or phenotype switching refers to the transition from a proliferative to an invasive cellular state. We previously identified a 122-gene epigenetic gene signature that classifies primary melanomas as low versus high risk (denoted as Epgn1 or Epgn3). We found that the transcriptomes of the Epgn1 low-risk and Epgn3 high-risk cells are similar to the proliferative and invasive cellular states, respectively. These signatures were further validated in melanoma tumor samples. Examination of the chromatin landscape revealed differential H3K27 acetylation in the Epgn1 low-risk versus Epgn3 high-risk cell lines that corroborated with a differential super-enhancer and enhancer landscape. Melanocytic lineage genes (MITF, its targets and regulators) were associated with super-enhancers in the Epgn1 low-risk state, whereas invasiveness genes were linked with Epgn3 high-risk status. We identified the ITGA3 gene as marked by a super-enhancer element in the Epgn3 invasive cells. Silencing of ITGA3 enhanced invasiveness in both in vitro and in vivo systems, suggesting it as a negative regulator of invasion. In conclusion, we define chromatin landscape changes associated with Epgn1/Epgn3 and phenotype switching during early steps of melanoma progression that regulate transcriptional reprogramming. This super-enhancer and enhancer-driven epigenetic regulatory mechanism resulting in major changes in the transcriptome could be important in future therapeutic targeting efforts.

Authors

Karen Mendelson, Tiphaine C. Martin, Christie B. Nguyen, Min Hsu, Jia Xu, Claudia Lang, Reinhard Dummer, Yvonne Saenger, Jane L. Messina, Vernon K. Sondak, Garrett Desman, Dan Hasson, Emily Bernstein, Ramon E. Parsons, Julide Tok Celebi

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,072 233
PDF 149 34
Figure 356 0
Supplemental data 320 19
Citation downloads 107 0
Totals 2,004 286
Total Views 2,290

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts