Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
MiR-431 attenuates synaptic plasticity and memory deficits in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice
Jianwei Ge, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Shu, Linjie Yu, Ruomeng Qin, Wenyuan Tao, Pinyi Liu, Xiaohong Dong, Zhen Lan, Xinyu Bao, Lei Ye, Yun Xu, Xiaolei Zhu
Jianwei Ge, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Shu, Linjie Yu, Ruomeng Qin, Wenyuan Tao, Pinyi Liu, Xiaohong Dong, Zhen Lan, Xinyu Bao, Lei Ye, Yun Xu, Xiaolei Zhu
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Aging Therapeutics

MiR-431 attenuates synaptic plasticity and memory deficits in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Synaptic plasticity impairment plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and emerging evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRs) are alternative biomarkers and therapeutic targets for synaptic dysfunctions in AD. In this study, we found that the level of miR-431 was downregulated in the plasma of patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and AD. In addition, it was decreased in the hippocampus and plasma of APPswe/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) mice. Lentivirus-mediated miR-431 overexpression in the hippocampus CA1 ameliorated synaptic plasticity and memory deficits of APP/PS1 mice, while it did not affect amyloid-β levels. Smad4 was identified as a target of miR-431, and Smad4 knockdown modulated the expression of synaptic proteins, including SAP102, and protected against synaptic plasticity and memory dysfunctions in APP/PS1 mice. Furthermore, Smad4 overexpression reversed the protective effects of miR-431, indicating that miR-431 attenuated synaptic impairment at least partially by Smad4 inhibition. Thus, these results indicated that miR-431/Smad4 might be a potential therapeutic target for AD treatment.

Authors

Jianwei Ge, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Shu, Linjie Yu, Ruomeng Qin, Wenyuan Tao, Pinyi Liu, Xiaohong Dong, Zhen Lan, Xinyu Bao, Lei Ye, Yun Xu, Xiaolei Zhu

×

Figure 7

Inhibition of Smad4 attenuates synaptic plasticity deficits in 6-month-old APP/PS1 mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Inhibition of Smad4 attenuates synaptic plasticity deficits in 6-month-o...
(A) Electron micrographs displaying synapse numbers (upper panel, bar = 1 μm) and the thickness of PSD (lower panel, bar = 2 μm) in the hippocampus CA1 after AAV-sh-Smad4 treatment. (B) Quantitative analysis of synapse numbers. n = 3 mice per group. F (2, 6) = 14.57, P = 0.0050. (C) Golgi staining in the hippocampus CA1 after AAV-sh-Smad4 treatment. Bar = 10 μm. Quantification of spine density (D) [F (2, 6) = 13.78, P = 0.0057] and mushroom spine percentage (E) [F (2, 6) = 13.38, P = 0.0061]. n = 3 mice per group. (F and G) The expressions of synaptic proteins were measured by Western blot. (H) The I/O slope of hippocampal CA1 in Lv-miR-431–treated APP/PS1 mice. (I and J) High-frequency induced LTP stimulation was observed in hippocampal CA1 area. F (2, 6) = 27.32, P = 0.0010. n = 3 mice per group. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. AAV-WT group; #P <0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs. AAV-con group. All data were presented as means ± SEM. One-way ANOVA (B, D, E, I, and J), 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (G), and 2-way ANOVA (H) were used.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts