Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The schedule of ATR inhibitor AZD6738 can potentiate or abolish antitumor immune responses to radiotherapy
Frank P. Vendetti, Pinakin Pandya, David A. Clump, Sandra Schamus-Haynes, Meysam Tavakoli, Maria diMayorca, Naveed M. Islam, Jina Chang, Greg M. Delgoffe, Jan H. Beumer, Christopher J. Bakkenist
Frank P. Vendetti, Pinakin Pandya, David A. Clump, Sandra Schamus-Haynes, Meysam Tavakoli, Maria diMayorca, Naveed M. Islam, Jina Chang, Greg M. Delgoffe, Jan H. Beumer, Christopher J. Bakkenist
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

The schedule of ATR inhibitor AZD6738 can potentiate or abolish antitumor immune responses to radiotherapy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Inhibitors of the DNA damage signaling kinase ATR increase tumor cell killing by chemotherapies that target DNA replication forks but also kill rapidly proliferating immune cells including activated T cells. Nevertheless, ATR inhibitor (ATRi) and radiotherapy (RT) can be combined to generate CD8+ T cell–dependent antitumor responses in mouse models. To determine the optimal schedule of ATRi and RT, we determined the impact of short-course versus prolonged daily treatment with AZD6738 (ATRi) on responses to RT (days 1–2). Short-course ATRi (days 1–3) plus RT caused expansion of tumor antigen–specific, effector CD8+ T cells in the tumor-draining lymph node (DLN) at 1 week after RT. This was preceded by acute decreases in proliferating tumor-infiltrating and peripheral T cells and a rapid proliferative rebound after ATRi cessation, increased inflammatory signaling (IFN-β, chemokines, particularly CXCL10) in tumors, and an accumulation of inflammatory cells in the DLN. In contrast, prolonged ATRi (days 1–9) prevented the expansion of tumor antigen–specific, effector CD8+ T cells in the DLN, and entirely abolished the therapeutic benefit of short-course ATRi with RT and anti–PD-L1. Our data argue that ATRi cessation is essential to allow CD8+ T cell responses to both RT and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors

Frank P. Vendetti, Pinakin Pandya, David A. Clump, Sandra Schamus-Haynes, Meysam Tavakoli, Maria diMayorca, Naveed M. Islam, Jina Chang, Greg M. Delgoffe, Jan H. Beumer, Christopher J. Bakkenist

×

Figure 1

Short-course ATRi plus RT promotes tumor antigen–specific CD8+ T cell expansion in the DLN.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Short-course ATRi plus RT promotes tumor antigen–specific CD8+ T cell ex...
(A–E) CT26 tumor–bearing mice were treated with ATRi on days 1–3 (ATRi QDx3), RT on days 1–2 (RT 2 Gy x 2), ATRi QDx3 + RT, or vehicle, and tumor-draining lymph nodes (DLNs) were immunoprofiled at day 9. (A) Representative cytograms depicting CD62L and CD44 expression on CD8+ T cells. Activated and naive CD8+ T cell subsets were defined as effector/effector memory (Tem; CD44hiCD62Llo), central memory (Tcm; CD62LhiCD44hi), or naive (Tn; CD62LhiCD44lo). (B) Quantitation of CD8+ Tem cells as percentages of CD8+ T cells or per 1,000 cells stained. Data from at least 4 independent experiments with 1–3 mice per group. n = 9 Vehicle, 7 ATRi QDx3, 9 RT, 11 ATRi QDx3 + RT. (C–E) Tumor antigen–specific CD8+ T cells were labeled with AH1 Pentamer. (C) Representative cytograms depicting Pentamer+ CD8+ T cells. Fluorescence-minus-one (no Pentamer) and naive (negative, no tumor) controls shown. (D) Quantitation of Pentamer+ CD8+ T cells as percentages of CD8+CD4– cells or CD45+ immune cells. (E) Quantitation of Pentamer+ CD8+ Tem and Tcm cells as percentages of CD8+CD4– Tem and Tcm cells. (D and E) Data from at least 5 independent experiments with 1–5 mice per group. n = 12 Vehicle, 13 ATRi QDx3, 13 RT, 14 ATRi QDx3 + RT. (B, D, and E) Mean and SD bars shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts