Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(11):e165373. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165373.
Abstract
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody–associated disease (MOGAD) is an inflammatory demyelinating CNS condition characterized by the presence of MOG autoantibodies. We sought to investigate whether human MOG autoantibodies are capable of mediating damage to MOG-expressing cells through multiple mechanisms. We developed high-throughput assays to measure complement activity (CA), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of live MOG-expressing cells. MOGAD patient sera effectively mediate all of these effector functions. Our collective analyses reveal that (a) cytotoxicity is not incumbent on MOG autoantibody quantity alone; (b) engagement of effector functions by MOGAD patient serum is bimodal, with some sera exhibiting cytotoxic capacity while others did not; (c) the magnitude of CDC and ADCP is elevated closer to relapse, while MOG-IgG binding is not; and (d) all IgG subclasses can damage MOG-expressing cells. Histopathology from a representative MOGAD case revealed congruence between lesion histology and serum CDC and ADCP, and we identified NK cells, mediators of ADCC, in the cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing patients with MOGAD. Thus, MOGAD-derived autoantibodies are cytotoxic to MOG-expressing cells through multiple mechanisms, and assays quantifying CDC and ADCP may prove to be effective tools for predicting risk of future relapses.
Authors
Soumya S. Yandamuri, Beata Filipek, Abeer H. Obaid, Nikhil Lele, Joshua M. Thurman, Naila Makhani, Richard J. Nowak, Yong Guo, Claudia F. Lucchinetti, Eoin P. Flanagan, Erin E. Longbrake, Kevin C. O’Connor
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through December 2023.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,983 | 112 |
| 434 | 74 | |
| Figure | 181 | 3 |
| Table | 59 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 64 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,775 | 192 |
| Total Views | 2,967 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
