Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(12):e165356. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165356.
Abstract
Immune therapy is the new frontier of cancer treatment. Therapeutic radiation is a known inducer of immune response and can be limited by immunosuppressive mediators including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) that is highly expressed in aggressive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). A clinical cohort of TNBC tumors revealed poor radiation therapeutic efficacy in tumors expressing high COX2. Herein, we show that radiation combined with adjuvant NSAID (indomethacin) treatment provides a powerful combination to reduce both primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in aggressive 4T1 TNBC tumors, which occurs in part through increased antitumor immune response. Spatial immunological changes including augmented lymphoid infiltration into the tumor epithelium and locally increased cGAS/STING1 and type I IFN gene expression were observed in radiation-indomethacin–treated 4T1 tumors. Thus, radiation and adjuvant NSAID treatment shifts “immune desert phenotypes” toward antitumor M1/TH1 immune mediators in these immunologically challenging tumors. Importantly, radiation-indomethacin combination treatment improved local control of the primary lesion, reduced metastatic burden, and increased median survival when compared with radiation treatment alone. These results show that clinically available NSAIDs can improve radiation therapeutic efficacy through increased antitumor immune response and augmented local generation of cGAS/STING1 and type I IFNs.
Authors
Lisa A. Ridnour, Robert Y.S. Cheng, Noemi Kedei, Veena Somasundaram, Dibyangana D. Bhattacharyya, Debashree Basudhar, Adelaide L. Wink, Abigail J. Walke, Caleb Kim, William F. Heinz, Elijah F. Edmondson, Donna O. Butcher, Andrew C. Warner, Tiffany H. Dorsey, Milind Pore, Robert J. Kinders, Stanley Lipkowitz, Richard J. Bryant, Jens Rittscher, Stephen T.C. Wong, Stephen M. Hewitt, Jenny C. Chang, Aliaa Shalaby, Grace M. Callagy, Sharon A. Glynn, Stefan Ambs, Stephen K. Anderson, Daniel W. McVicar, Stephen J. Lockett, David A. Wink
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through March 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,974 | 116 |
| 519 | 59 | |
| Figure | 638 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 150 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 78 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,359 | 178 |
| Total Views | 3,537 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
