Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
PPARγ agonist treatment reduces fibroadipose tissue in secondary lymphedema by exhausting fibroadipogenic PDGFRα+ mesenchymal cells
Ziyu Chen, … , Vicki Rosen, Shailesh Agarwal
Ziyu Chen, … , Vicki Rosen, Shailesh Agarwal
Published December 22, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(24):e165324. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165324.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology

PPARγ agonist treatment reduces fibroadipose tissue in secondary lymphedema by exhausting fibroadipogenic PDGFRα+ mesenchymal cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Secondary lymphedema occurs in up to 20% of patients after lymphadenectomy performed for the surgical management of tumors involving the breast, prostate, uterus, and skin. Patients develop progressive edema of the affected extremity due to retention of protein-rich lymphatic fluid. Despite compression therapy, patients progress to chronic lymphedema in which noncompressible fibrosis and adipose tissue are deposited within the extremity. The presence of fibrosis led to our hypothesis that rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist that inhibits fibrosis, would reduce fibrosis in a mouse model of secondary lymphedema after hind limb lymphadenectomy. In vivo, rosiglitazone reduced fibrosis in the hind limb after lymphadenectomy. Our findings verified that rosiglitazone reestablished the adipogenic features of TGF-β1–treated mesenchymal cells in vitro. Despite this, rosiglitazone led to a reduction in adipose tissue deposition. Single-cell RNA-Seq data obtained from human tissues and flow cytometric and histological evaluation of mouse tissues demonstrated increased presence of PDGFRα+ cells in lymphedema; human tissue analysis verified these cells have the capacity for adipogenic and fibrogenic differentiation. Upon treatment with rosiglitazone, we noted a reduction in the overall quantity of PDGFRα+ cells and LipidTOX+ cells. Our findings provide a framework for treating secondary lymphedema as a condition of fibrosis and adipose tissue deposition, both of which, paradoxically, can be prevented with a pro-adipogenic agent.

Authors

Ziyu Chen, Soheila Ali Akbari Ghavimi, Mengfan Wu, John McNamara, Olga Barreiro, David Maridas, Radomir Kratchmarov, Ashley Siegel, Sarah Djeddi, Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus, Patrick J. Brennan, Timothy P. Padera, Ulrich von Andrian, Babak Mehrara, Arin K. Greene, C. Ronald Kahn, Dennis P. Orgill, Indranil Sinha, Vicki Rosen, Shailesh Agarwal

×

Figure 1

A mouse model of hind limb lymphedema recapitulates augmented swelling and adipose tissue deposition observed in patients with lymphedema.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
A mouse model of hind limb lymphedema recapitulates augmented swelling a...
(A) Surgical procedure for hind limb lymphadenectomy in mice. (B) Normalized circumference of hind limbs with/without lymphadenectomy and rosiglitazone treatment (n = 8); comparison between No injury + Vehicle and LN + Vehicle is indicated by *; comparison between LN + Vehicle and LN + Rosiglitazone is indicated by #. (C) Normalized edema volume of hind limbs with/without lymphadenectomy and rosiglitazone treatment (n = 8); comparison between No injury + Vehicle and LN + Vehicle is indicated by *; comparison between LN + Vehicle and LN + Rosiglitazone is indicated by #. (D) H&E staining of No injury + Vehicle and LN + Vehicle day 7 and day 21, as well as LN + Rosiglitazone day 7 and day 21 hind limbs, original magnification 4×, scale bar: 500 μm. (E) Quantification of overall hind limb skin thickness (n = 8). (F) Quantification of hind limb fibroadipose tissue thickness (n = 8). (G) Quantification of hind limb dermis thickness (n = 8). (H) Quantification of hind limb epidermis thickness (n = 8). Statistical significance is established using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001. LN, lymphadenectomy; E, epidermis; D, dermis; F, fibroadipose tissue; M, muscle.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts