Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Hypothalamic and brainstem glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor neurons employ distinct mechanisms to affect feeding
Alice Adriaenssens, … , Fiona Gribble, Frank Reimann
Alice Adriaenssens, … , Fiona Gribble, Frank Reimann
Published May 22, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(10):e164921. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.164921.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism Neuroscience

Hypothalamic and brainstem glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor neurons employ distinct mechanisms to affect feeding

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Central glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) signaling is critical in GIP-based therapeutics’ ability to lower body weight, but pathways leveraged by GIPR pharmacology in the brain remain incompletely understood. We explored the role of Gipr neurons in the hypothalamus and dorsal vagal complex (DVC) — brain regions critical to the control of energy balance. Hypothalamic Gipr expression was not necessary for the synergistic effect of GIPR/GLP-1R coagonism on body weight. While chemogenetic stimulation of both hypothalamic and DVC Gipr neurons suppressed food intake, activation of DVC Gipr neurons reduced ambulatory activity and induced conditioned taste avoidance, while there was no effect of a short-acting GIPR agonist (GIPRA). Within the DVC, Gipr neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), but not the area postrema (AP), projected to distal brain regions and were transcriptomically distinct. Peripherally dosed fluorescent GIPRAs revealed that access was restricted to circumventricular organs in the CNS. These data demonstrate that Gipr neurons in the hypothalamus, AP, and NTS differ in their connectivity, transcriptomic profile, peripheral accessibility, and appetite-controlling mechanisms. These results highlight the heterogeneity of the central GIPR signaling axis and suggest that studies into the effects of GIP pharmacology on feeding behavior should consider the interplay of multiple regulatory pathways.

Authors

Alice Adriaenssens, Johannes Broichhagen, Anne de Bray, Julia Ast, Annie Hasib, Ben Jones, Alejandra Tomas, Natalie Figueredo Burgos, Orla Woodward, Jo Lewis, Elisabeth O’Flaherty, Kimberley El, Canqi Cui, Norio Harada, Nobuya Inagaki, Jonathan Campbell, Daniel Brierley, David J. Hodson, Ricardo Samms, Fiona Gribble, Frank Reimann

×

Figure 8

Stabilized, fluorescently labeled GIP peptides are specific and effective GIPR agonists that access circumventricular organs in the CNS.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Stabilized, fluorescently labeled GIP peptides are specific and effectiv...
(A) Taste avoidance conditioned by vehicle or GIP-532 (10 nmol/kg, s.c.) or LiCl (0.4M, i.p.) in WT mice. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis performed using a 1-way ANOVA with a Dunnett’s post hoc test. n = 4–5. ***P < 0.001. (B) Schematic showing nature and binding of the stabilized red (sGIP549) and far red (sGIP648) GIPR probes (GIPR pdb: 7ra3). (C) sGIP549, sGIP648, and native GIP(1-42) cAMP signaling responses in T-REx-SNAP-GIPR cells, n = 3. (D and E) sGIP648 (D) and sGIP549 (E) label GIPRGCaMP3 reporter islets, showing colocalization with GCaMP3+ cells (n = 11-12 islets, 2 animals). (F) sGIP648 labels β cells, identified using LUX551, in Giprfl/fl control but not Gipr–/–βcell islets. Arrows show GIPR labeling only in LUX551– cells, presumed to be α cells (n = 63 islets, 10 animals). (G) sGIP549 labels β cells, identified using LUX645, in Giprfl/fl control but not Gipr–/–βcell islets. Arrows show GIPR labeling only in LUX645– cells, presumed to be α cells (n = 56 islets, 10 animals). (H) sGIP648 labels the DVC and MBH following i.v. administration in mice. (Veh: n = 4, sGIP648: n = 7). (I) c-Fos activation in the DVC following i.v. injection of vehicle or sGIP648 into Gipr+/+ or Gipr–/– mice (n = 3 mice per genotype per treatment). (J and K) Maximum intensity projection of the average signal computed from individual brains (n = 4) overlaid onto the Common Coordinate Framework V3 template from AIBS for mice treated with vehicle (J) or D-alaGIP/IR800 (K). CP, choroid plexus; DVC, dorsal vagal complex; MBH mediobasal hypothalamus; ARH, arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus; ME, median eminence; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; AP, area postrema; Scale bar: 53 μm (D–G).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts