Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Oncology

The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC cells and negatively in BRAF-mutant CRC cells with gene signatures for EMT, cell proliferation and survival, and ERK signaling. On a mechanistic level, ZEB1 knockdown in KRAS-mutant CRC cells increased apoptosis and reduced clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth; the reverse occurred in BRAFV600E CRC cells. ZEB1 is associated with better prognosis and reduced EMT signature in patients harboring BRAF CRCs. These data suggest that ZEB1 can function as a tumor suppressor in BRAF-mutant CRCs, highlighting the importance of considering the KRAS/BRAF mutational background of CRCs in therapeutic strategies targeting ZEB1/EMT.

Authors

Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo

×

Figure 6

ZEB1 is associated with different gene signatures in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
ZEB1 is associated with different gene signatures in KRAS- and BRAF-muta...
(A) Heatmap of the 2499 differential expressed genes in 3 samples of LS174TCTL, LS174TZEB1KD, RKOCTL, and RKOZEB1KD. (B) Venn diagram of the DEG in LS174TZEB1KD versus LS174TCTL (mutant [mut] KRAS CRC) and RKOZEB1KD versus RKOCTL cells (BRAF-mut CRC). (C) Bar plot of normalized enrichment score (NES) of gene ontology annotations for selected signaling pathways enriched (yellow) or downregulated (blue) in RKOCTLvsZEB1KD versus LS174TCTLvsZEB1KD or in individual RKOCTLvsZEB1KD (BRAF-mut CRC) and LS174TCTLvsZEB1KD (KRAS-mut CRC). (D) Cnet plot of RKOCTLvsZEB1KD showing DEG associations. Genes are colored on the basis of the fold change associated. FDR < 0.05. (E) Fold-change expression of the indicated genes in KRAS-mutant (LS174T) and BRAF-mutant (RKO) CRC cells interfered with siZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) (red), siKRAS (KRAS KD) (blue), or siBRAF (BRAF KD) (green) in comparison with siCtl (0 baseline). (F) GSEA and box plot of an EMT signature in BRAF-mutant CRC cells interfered with siZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) in comparison with siCtl (CTL). (G) E-cadherin (CDH1), tight junction protein ZO-3 (TJP3), occludin (OCLN), claudin 1 (CLDN1), vimentin (VIM), and fibronectin III domain-containing protein 4 (FNDC4) relative mRNA expression in KRAS-mutant (LS174T) (blue) and BRAF-mutant (RKO) (green) CRC cells lentivirally interfered with siZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) in comparison with CTL quantified by qRT-PCR using GAPDH as the reference gene. The 0 value line represents the value of each gene in CTL. (E–G) Bars represent the mean of ≥3 independent experiments performed in triplicate with the SD. An unpaired t test was used to determine statistical significance. P values are included in Supplemental Table 16. ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, or *P ≤ 0.05.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts